debian-policy Jun 2000 by subject

[First Page] <
[previous page] 		Page 1 of 1 >
[next page] 		[Last Page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]
Re: 'editor' alternative policy? Bug#11094: Policy should mention that serial lines require UUCP-style locking Bug#13353: marked as done ([OLD PROPOSAL] Keywords field for packages) Bug#21585: marked as done ([REJECTED] /etc/init.d/<script> need not be a conffile if actively maintained) Bug#22935: PROPOSED] Do not make hardlinks to conffiles Bug#23661: usr/doc should not be accessible through http servers by default Bug#25533: marked as done ([OLD PROPOSAL] Debian-policy should probably contain the FHS standard) Bug#25882: U/gid 100 should be statically allocated Bug#26159: marked as done ([OLD PROPOSAL] Contact address for virtual package name list) Bug#26915: marked as done ([OLD PROPOSAL] Debian Logo License) Bug#27137: REJECTED] Clarification of non-free: packages encouraging donations with claims about non-donation Bug#27205: marked as done ([REJECTED] Daemons should run as root only if really needed) Bug#27869: marked as done ([REJECTED] Icon location policy) Bug#29770: marked as done ([REJECTED] Differentiate between conffile and configuration file in policy) Bug#30036: OLD PROPOSAL] Including subpolicies (emacs, menu etc) in policy Bug#30036: OLD PROPOSAL] Including subpolicies (emacs, menu etc) in policy Bug#30122: marked as done ([REJECTED] Fix bad advice about conffile management) Bug#31441: marked as done ([REJECTED] Require both fcntl() and dotlock mailbox locking to prevent mail loss) Bug#32263: marked as done ([OLD PROPOSAL] Split /cgi-bin/ into system and local parts) Bug#32263: Splitting cgi-bin Bug#33826: REJECTED] Policy should discuss '.sh' suffixes on /etc/init.d files Bug#34046: marked as done ([REJECTED] runlevels policy: xdm should not be started in all multi-user runlevels by default) Bug#34610: OLD PROPOSAL] unsuffixed shared libraries Bug#34652: marked as done (Policy is not clear enough about nawk.) Bug#35510: marked as done ([OLD PROPOSAL] mirror license seems Debian-specific) Bug#36151: REJECTED] /etc/init.d scripts should specify an explicit PATH Bug#36151: REJECTED] /etc/init.d scripts should specify an explicit PATH Bug#36619: marked as done ([REJECTED] Allowable values of PAGER variable should be described in policy) Bug#37251: marked as done ([REJECTED] Software depending on non-US) Bug#37262: marked as done ([REJECTED] Software depending on non-US) Bug#37999: OLD PROPOSAL]: A pre-install required space checking mechanism for Debian packages Bug#38612: marked as done ([PROPOSED] Have proposal-submitting guidelines in policy package) Bug#38703: marked as done ([OLD PROPOSAL] A better way to configure debian systems) Bug#38902: Reassign bug to ftp.debian.org Bug#39408: marked as done (Policy self-reference broken) Bug#43529: marked as done (debian-policy: mail locking in Debian is _not_ NFS safe) Bug#45406: marked as done ([REJECTED] Config files must have manpages) Bug#61058: FHS: /usr/local/share/man instead of /usr/local/man ? Bug#61058: marked as done (FHS: /usr/local/share/man instead of /usr/local/man ?) Bug#64437: PROPOSED] Must/Should/May in policy Bug#65577: [PROPOSED] README.Debian should include notice if a package is not a part of Debian distribution Bug#65577: Amended] copyright should include notice if a package is not a part of Debian distribution Bug#65577: PROPOSED] README.Debian should include notice if a package is not a part of Debian distribution Bug#65577: PROPOSED] README.Debian should include notice if a package is not a part of Debian distribution Bug#65577: PROPOSED] README.Debian should include notice if a package is not a part of Debian distribution Bug#65578: [PROPOSED] extra-Debian packages should have extra Priority Bug#65764: changelog shouldn't be in the copyright file Bug#65764: my thoughts Bug#65765: a needless paragraph Bug#65847: packaging-manual: no mention of Build-Depends in chapter 4 Bug#66023: [PROPOSAL] Treat plugins and shared libraries differently Bug#66023: PROPOSAL] Treat plugins and shared libraries differently Bug#66357: marked as done (No MD5sums for (most) base files) Bug#66535: proposal of virtual package: syslogd CVS jdg: * Added FHS details to copyright file CVS jdg: Add fhs-2.1 to source package CVS jdg: Renumbered version to 3.2.0.0 ISO 8601 Moving doc section of policy and packaging manuals Re: Parseable copyright files Parseable copyright files (was: Re: Bug#65577: PROPOSED] README.Debian should include notice if a package is not a part of Debian distribution) Processed: Bug#34610: [OLD PROPOSAL] unsuffixed shared libraries Processed: Bug#45406: [PROPOSAL] Config files must have manpages Processed: change proposal severity Processed: fix submitter address Processed: RC downgrades Processed: Re: Bug#27205: marked as done ([REJECTED] Daemons should run as root only if really needed) Processed: Re: Bug#32263: Splitting cgi-bin Processed: Re: Bug#64437: PROPOSED] Must/Should/May in policy Processed: Re: Bug#66357: No MD5sums for (most) base files Processed: Reassign bug to ftp.debian.org Processed: reopen FHS bug report Processed: Reopening important policy proposals Processed: retitle again. Processed: Retitle bug (2nd attempt) Processed: Splitting cgi-bin proposal: treat plugins and shared libraries differently Re: Q about Build-Depends vs Build-Depends-Indep Re: unusable examples in apckages ... Updating policy Re: Virtual packages (was Re: Bug#64006:) The last update was on 10:41 GMT Sat May 11. There are 155 messages. Page 1 of 1.
<<
[previous month] 		|<
[first page] 		<
[previous page] 		Page 1 of 1
 >
[next page] 		>|
[last page] 		>>
[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]
Mail converted by MHonArc