Bug#32263: marked as done ([OLD PROPOSAL] Split /cgi-bin/ into system and local parts)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Jun 2000 18:37:52 +0100
with message-id <20000621183752.A4397@polya>
and subject line Bug#32263: [OLD PROPOSAL] Split /cgi-bin/ into system and local parts
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jan 1999 03:59:50 +0000
Received: (qmail 11060 invoked from network); 22 Jan 1999 03:59:50 -0000
Received: from cpu1612.adsl.bellglobal.com (HELO gatekeeper.bcwhite.ml.org) (mail@206.47.27.93)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 22 Jan 1999 03:59:50 -0000
Received: from dragon.bcwhite.ml.org (pobox.com) [192.168.1.10] (bcwhite)
by gatekeeper.bcwhite.ml.org with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian))
id 103XlM-0007Bl-00; Thu, 21 Jan 1999 23:00:04 -0500
Sender: bcwhite
Message-ID: <36A7F7E1.BC931B67@pobox.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 23:00:33 -0500
From: Brian White <bcwhite@pobox.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.0.36 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Debian Bugs <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Unexpected use of /cgi-bin/
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Package: apache
Version: 1.3.3-4
As there were really no objections to the personal mail I sent about this,
I'm filing it as a bug...
Most people setting up a web site expect /cgi-bin/ to be available for
scripts on their site. Unfortunately, Debian uses this for those scripts
packages that get installed. These two need to be independant.
As such, Debian's system needs to be altered a bit. I recommend using
instead the name "/cgi-lib/" for scripts under /usr/lib/cgi-bin/. This
will keep both features independant and not affect the general use of
the system.
Brian
( bcwhite@pobox.com )
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You can never be too good looking or too well equipped. -- Dilbert
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 32263-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jun 2000 18:20:27 +0000
>From J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk Wed Jun 21 13:20:27 2000
Return-path: <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk>
Received: from mserv1d.u-net.net [195.102.240.96]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
id 134p6x-0002FJ-00; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 13:20:27 -0500
Received: from [195.102.197.253] (helo=polya)
by mserv1d.u-net.net with esmtp (Exim 2.10 #36)
id 134p9c-0005xl-00
for 32263-done@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 19:23:12 +0100
Received: from jdg by polya with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 134oRk-000191-00; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 18:37:52 +0100
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 18:37:52 +0100
From: Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk>
To: 32263-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#32263: [OLD PROPOSAL] Split /cgi-bin/ into system and local parts
Message-ID: <20000621183752.A4397@polya>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i
Delivered-To: 32263-done@bugs.debian.org
This proposal seems to have gathered dust and was never clearly
decided either way. So I am closing it.
Julian
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see http://www.debian.org/~jdg
Donate free food to the world's hungry: see http://www.thehungersite.com/
Reply to: