Processed: Bug#34610: [OLD PROPOSAL] unsuffixed shared libraries

To: Julian Gilbey <jdg@master.debian.org>
Cc: Debian Policy List <debian-policy@lists.debian.org>(debian-policy #34610)
Subject: Processed: Bug#34610: [OLD PROPOSAL] unsuffixed shared libraries
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 13:29:02 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] handler.s.C.9616116178599.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20000621190538.A4484@polya>
References: <[🔎] 20000621190538.A4484@polya>

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 34610 mico
Bug#34610: [OLD PROPOSAL] unsuffixed shared libraries
Bug reassigned from package `debian-policy' to `mico'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#34610: OLD PROPOSAL] unsuffixed shared libraries
  - From: Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk>

Prev by Date: Bug#36151: REJECTED] /etc/init.d scripts should specify an explicit PATH
Next by Date: Bug#31441: marked as done ([REJECTED] Require both fcntl() and dotlock mailbox locking to prevent mail loss)
Previous by thread: Bug#34610: OLD PROPOSAL] unsuffixed shared libraries
Next by thread: Bug#36151: REJECTED] /etc/init.d scripts should specify an explicit PATH
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread