Bug#61058: FHS: /usr/local/share/man instead of /usr/local/man ?

To: Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk>
Cc: Daniel Quinlan <quinlan@transmeta.com>, 61058@bugs.debian.org, FHS discussion list <fhs-discuss@ucsd.edu>
Subject: Bug#61058: FHS: /usr/local/share/man instead of /usr/local/man ?
From: Daniel Quinlan <quinlan@transmeta.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 11:15:06 -0700 (PDT)
Message-id: <[🔎] 14670.25386.778728.769374@sodium.transmeta.com>
Reply-to: quinlan@transmeta.com, 61058@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20000619191233.A28711@polya>
References: <20000324183439.A18606@53b.de> <20000328115453.A27358@none> <20000330000535.A19247@53b.de> <6yog77j22z.fsf@magnesium.transmeta.com> <[🔎] 20000619191233.A28711@polya>

> Do we have a consensus on what should be done?  Are we happy with
> /usr/local/share/man?

Yes.  Next revision of FHS will fix the issue.

Dan

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#61058: FHS: /usr/local/share/man instead of /usr/local/man ?
  - From: Julian Gilbey <J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk>