Bug#66357: marked as done (No MD5sums for (most) base files)
Your message dated Thu, 29 Jun 2000 13:04:13 +0200
with message-id <20000629130413.E1165@wiggy.net>
and subject line Bug#66357: No MD5sums for (most) base files
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jun 2000 16:03:03 +0000
>From erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr Tue Jun 27 11:03:03 2000
Return-path: <erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr>
Received: from gordion.cs.bilkent.edu.tr [139.179.21.213]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
id 136xpE-0001IT-00; Tue, 27 Jun 2000 11:03:01 -0500
Received: from borg.cs.bilkent.edu.tr (mail@pccluster [139.179.21.143])
by gordion.cs.bilkent.edu.tr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA03301
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 27 Jun 2000 18:58:49 +0300 (EET DST)
Received: from exa by borg.cs.bilkent.edu.tr with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 136xvW-0002vK-00; Tue, 27 Jun 2000 19:09:30 +0300
From: exa <erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: No MD5sums for (most) base files
X-Reportbug-Version: 0.54
X-Mailer: reportbug 0.54
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 19:09:30 +0300
Message-Id: <E136xvW-0002vK-00@borg.cs.bilkent.edu.tr>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: base
Version: N/A; reported 2000-06-27
Severity: important
Today, I've had the chance to thrash my root filesystem. While I
was recovering the root fs, I tried to find the corrupt files with
debsums. However, I then recalled that base files didn't really
have MD5sums with them. (Package x didn't come with checksums).
Of course, this isn't a debsums bug. The problem is that you would
expect the most important packages to come with checksums. For instance,
libc6. I suggest that all files in the base distribution come with
md5sums in proper.
Thanks,
__
Eray Ozkural
CS Dept., Bilkent Univ.
mail: erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr
-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux borg 2.2.14 #1 Wed Mar 29 19:43:52 EEST 2000 i686
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 66357-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jun 2000 12:31:11 +0000
>From wichert@cistron.nl Thu Jun 29 07:31:10 2000
Return-path: <wichert@cistron.nl>
Received: from soil08.soil.nl (fog.mors.wiggy.net) [132.229.135.68]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
id 137dTK-00079C-00; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 07:31:10 -0500
Received: (from wichert@localhost)
by fog.mors.wiggy.net (8.11.0.Beta1/8.10.1/Debian 8.10.1-1) id e5TB4DO01643;
Thu, 29 Jun 2000 13:04:13 +0200
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 13:04:13 +0200
From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@wiggy.net>
To: exa <erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr>, 66357-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#66357: No MD5sums for (most) base files
Message-ID: <20000629130413.E1165@wiggy.net>
References: <E136xvW-0002vK-00@borg.cs.bilkent.edu.tr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sHrvAb52M6C8blB9"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i
In-Reply-To: <E136xvW-0002vK-00@borg.cs.bilkent.edu.tr>; from erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr on Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 07:09:30PM +0300
Delivered-To: 66357-done@bugs.debian.org
--sHrvAb52M6C8blB9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Previously exa wrote:
> Of course, this isn't a debsums bug. The problem is that you would
> expect the most important packages to come with checksums. For instance,
> libc6. I suggest that all files in the base distribution come with
> md5sums in proper.
This won't make sense until we have signed packages anyway.
Wichert.
--=20
_________________________________________________________________
/ Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \
| wichert@liacs.nl http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
--sHrvAb52M6C8blB9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAjlbLS0ACgkQPLiSUC+jvC2x7wCfZQpLZg81h5wGBPB0iJU0gli5
gTQAn2FgCd8DaQ0g7y929ZKEddBeGqrN
=lIvM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--sHrvAb52M6C8blB9--
Reply to: