Bug#23661: usr/doc should not be accessible through http servers by default
> > My guess is that debconf could be pressed into service, here. For woody,
> > it would be nice to have a whole category of optional questions related to
> > "do you want this exported or not". Share some initial leading question
> > or three, so that people can choose whether they want this level of detail
> > at config time, and then leave the rest up to package implementation.
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 06:19:29PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> This sounds really interesting. I think it needs some work before it
> becomes a policy proposal, but I think this is better than just
> referring to /usr/doc.
> I think this is more of a "show me the code" type of situation.
I need to think through the concepts a bit more before I try tackling
code. [A proof of concept doesn't seem hard -- what seems hard is a
not-too-ambitious statement of what I'm trying to accomplish.]