On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 12:16:58PM -0400, andrea.glorioso@centrotemporeale.it wrote: > > Schedules, first of all, which could force DeMuDi to release earlier > than Debian does. Other partners of the project, which must be dealt > with. These are the two first things I can come up with from the top > of my head. In that case I would rather base my releases based upon debian stable, since releasing a set of products/packages based on a specific prone-to-bugs release of testing or unstable distros (meaning that you cannot install the packages after few days due to a gcc/libc/other transition) could lead to disaster. mooch -- Jesus Climent | Unix SysAdm | Helsinki, Finland | pumuki.hispalinux.es GPG: 1024D/86946D69 BB64 2339 1CAA 7064 E429 7E18 66FC 1D7F 8694 6D69 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Registered Linux user #66350 proudly using Debian Sid & Linux 2.4.20 Shall I make us a nice cup of tea, Ma'am ? --Mrs. Mills (The others)
Attachment:
pgpCXmcdEat15.pgp
Description: PGP signature