debian-legal Jan 2001 by subject
|
[previous page]
|
Page 1 of 1 |
[next page]
|
|
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
APSL v1.2
Re: Bug#80891: New upstream available
Re: Bug#82116: README.why-python2 does not accurately describe licensing issues
RE: [Debian] License problems with UPX (ucl)
ecos license
(forw) Re: eCos license
Intel Microcode License [Resolved]
is the license of gsview okay?
ITP: lib-bsf-java
Re: ITP: streamripper
"Legal Terms of Service" advice please
Licence question
New licence for cryto++ code-base
non-free packages - what exactly are the requirements from vendor?
Re: non-US?
Non-US packets
OpenDivX license
output message for "-version" option.
Re: [PROPOSAL] Allowing crypto in the main archive
Question about notification clauses
Question about the Vovida licence
Re-release restrictions (was: OpenDivX license)
Unidentified subject!
The last update was on 12:39 GMT Sun Aug 16. There are 83 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[Thread Index]
[Subject Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
Mail converted by MHonArc