debian-legal Jan 2001 by thread
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
ecos license
Andreas Schuldei
Re: ecos license
Raul Miller
(forw) Re: eCos license
Andreas Schuldei
Re: (forw) Re: eCos license
Raul Miller
Non-US packets
Christoph Weidemann
Re: Non-US packets
Raul Miller
Re: Non-US packets
Mark Brown
ITP: lib-bsf-java
Ola Lundqvist
Re: ITP: lib-bsf-java
Henning Makholm
APSL v1.2
Adam Hunt
Re: [PROPOSAL] Allowing crypto in the main archive
Adrian Bunk
Re: [PROPOSAL] Allowing crypto in the main archive
Raul Miller
Re: [PROPOSAL] Allowing crypto in the main archive
Seth David Schoen
Re: [PROPOSAL] Allowing crypto in the main archive
Raul Miller
Re: Bug#82116: README.why-python2 does not accurately describe licensing issues
Gregor Hoffleit
Re: Bug#82116: README.why-python2 does not accurately describe licensing issues
Chris Lawrence
Re: Bug#82116: README.why-python2 does not accurately describe licensing issues
Gregor Hoffleit
Question about notification clauses
Jon Eisenstein
Re: Question about notification clauses
Jeffry Smith
Re: Question about notification clauses
Jeffry Smith
Intel Microcode License [Resolved]
Giacomo Catenazzi
Re: Intel Microcode License [Resolved]
Raul Miller
Licence question
Pawel Wiecek
Re: Licence question
Peter Makholm
Re: Licence question
John Galt
Re: Bug#80891: New upstream available
Torsten Landschoff
RE: [Debian] License problems with UPX (ucl)
Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer
OpenDivX license
Davide Puricelli
Re: OpenDivX license
Brian Ristuccia
Re: OpenDivX license
Brian Behlendorf
Re: OpenDivX license
Brian Ristuccia
Re: OpenDivX license
Brian Behlendorf
Re: OpenDivX license
Joseph Carter
Re: OpenDivX license
Brian Behlendorf
Re: OpenDivX license
Sam TH
Re: OpenDivX license
David Starner
Re: OpenDivX license
Sam TH
Re: OpenDivX license
Brian Behlendorf
Re: OpenDivX license
Nicolás Lichtmaier
Re-release restrictions (was: OpenDivX license)
Wesley W. Terpstra
Re: Re-release restrictions (was: OpenDivX license)
Sam TH
Re: Re-release restrictions (was: OpenDivX license)
Nicolás Lichtmaier
Re: OpenDivX license
Samuel Hocevar
Re: OpenDivX license
David Starner
Unidentified subject!
Samuel Womble
<Possible follow-ups>
Unidentified subject!
Samuel Womble
non-free packages - what exactly are the requirements from vendor?
Brian Russo
Re: non-free packages - what exactly are the requirements from vendor?
Brian Russo
Re: non-free packages - what exactly are the requirements from vendor?
Mark Brown
Re: non-free packages - what exactly are the requirements from vendor?
Raul Miller
Re: non-US?
Sam TH
"Legal Terms of Service" advice please
Rick Younie
Re: "Legal Terms of Service" advice please
Brian Ristuccia
Re: "Legal Terms of Service" advice please
Remco Blaakmeer
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: "Legal Terms of Service" advice please
Rick Younie
Re: ITP: streamripper
Roland Bauerschmidt
Re: ITP: streamripper
Brian Ristuccia
Question about the Vovida licence
Jérôme Marant
Re: Question about the Vovida licence
Samuel Hocevar
Re: Question about the Vovida licence
Jeffry Smith
Re: Question about the Vovida licence
Sam TH
Re: Question about the Vovida licence
Joseph Carter
New licence for cryto++ code-base
Stephen Zander
Re: New licence for cryto++ code-base
David Starner
Re: New licence for cryto++ code-base
Stephen Zander
Re: New licence for cryto++ code-base
Sam TH
Re: New licence for cryto++ code-base
Joseph Carter
Re: New licence for cryto++ code-base
Jeffry Smith
Re: New licence for cryto++ code-base
Stephen Zander
Re: New licence for cryto++ code-base
Jeffry Smith
Re: New licence for cryto++ code-base
Sam TH
Re: New licence for cryto++ code-base
Bernhard R. Link
Re: New licence for cryto++ code-base
Henning Makholm
Re: New licence for cryto++ code-base
Sam TH
Re: New licence for cryto++ code-base
Henning Makholm
Re: New licence for cryto++ code-base
Sam TH
output message for "-version" option.
Taketoshi Sano
Re: output message for "-version" option.
Sam TH
is the license of gsview okay?
Atsuhito Kohda
Re: is the license of gsview okay?
David Starner
Re: is the license of gsview okay?
Atsuhito Kohda
Re: is the license of gsview okay?
David Starner
Re: is the license of gsview okay?
Atsuhito Kohda
The last update was on 12:39 GMT Sun Aug 16. There are 83 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Mail converted by
MHonArc