Re: DAM has no competency to make changes to membership structure
On Mon, Oct 27 2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> But like I said, let's proceed with the GR, I don't mind, it's merely
> disappointing.
By all means., No matter that the GR is a useless, no-op,
anti-ganneff vote, which serves no purpose whatsoever, except to kill
any motivation ganneff might have had to facilitate admission of
non-packagers into Debian. Why is it useless? Because, as the
announcement had said, there is nothing implemented yet, and so it
would take a long while before this was done, giving people ample time
for comment, and to convince the DAM's that modifications to the idea
might be better, but that i not the Debian way. The Debian way is to
find the least collegial way to express a difference of opinion.
manoj
--
Many people write memos to tell you they have nothing to say.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: