[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: DAM has no competency to make changes to membership structure

On Mon, Oct 27 2008, Pierre Habouzit wrote:

> But like I said, let's proceed with the GR, I don't mind, it's merely
> disappointing.

        By all means., No matter that the GR is a useless, no-op,
 anti-ganneff vote, which serves no purpose  whatsoever, except to kill
 any motivation ganneff might have had to facilitate admission of
 non-packagers into Debian. Why  is it useless? Because, as the
 announcement had said, there is nothing implemented yet, and so it
 would take a long while before this was done, giving people ample time
 for comment, and to convince the DAM's that modifications to the idea
 might be better, but that i not the Debian way. The Debian way is to
 find the least collegial way to express a difference of opinion.

Many people write memos to tell you they have nothing to say.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>  
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: