debian-tetex-maint Jun 2000 by subject

[First Page] <
[previous page] 		Page 1 of 1 >
[next page] 		[Last Page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]
Re: author causes error with amsart Automatically removing old fonts Bug in tetex preinstall scripts Bug#48142: marked as done (please include foiltex in tetex-nonfree again) Bug#50377: tetex-base: Russification problem (koi8-r and cp1251) Bug#51436: cant configure Bug#51586: Please Reopen 51586 ("secure" mode in dvips should be the default) Bug#56749: marked as done (tetex-bin: texconfig doesn't show the faq) Bug#56993: marked as done (tetex-base: New version available) Bug#56994: marked as done (tetex-bin: New version available) Bug#57492: marked as done ([Thomas Esser: new stable and beta versions of teTeX]) Bug#57493: marked as done ([Thomas Esser: new stable and beta versions of teTeX]) Bug#60253: More clearly Bug#60415: marked as done (tetex-bin: xdvi seems to work ok now.) Bug#60429: marked as done (metapost is not initialized) Bug#60429: please try these Bug#60441: I can't reproduce this bug Bug#60991: wrong idea Bug#61293: more information needed Bug#61839: marked as forwarded (tetex-doc: Standard Latex exmaple file (small.tex) is not installed?) Bug#61995: marked as done (does not configure) Bug#62017: tetex-bin: fmtutil( and texlinks): config file `fmtutil.cnf' not found Bug#62208: contradiction anyway Bug#62541: marked as done (Is it really required to check for old tex packages still?) Bug#62813: marked as done (tetex-bin: xdvi creates a temporary file without deleting it) Bug#62859: Does texdoctk fulfil your wish Bug#63082: please hold off any action regarding this bug until further notice Bug#63239: Problems whith LaTeX Bug#63331: marked as done (stmaryrd outdated) Bug#63366: marked as done (tetex-bin: pls remove texi2html now that it has its own package) Bug#63912: marked as done (seminar appears to be DFSG free) Bug#63930: marked as done (changebar.sty is old and buggy) Bug#64177: marked as done (tetex-bin: xdvi does not accept command-line options) Bug#64470: pdflatex: I can't find the format file `pdflatex.fmt'! Bug#64524: c-std.h contains declarations which conflict with stdio.h Bug#64524: marked as forwarded (c-std.h contains declarations which conflict with stdio.h) Bug#64560: marked as done (tetex-bin: xdvi wrapper script creates useless tempfiles) Bug#65053: Can't install tetex-bin 1.0.6-7 Bug#65111: marked as done (please update multicol.sty) Bug#65111: please update multicol.sty Bug#65429: boot-floppies installation stopped by tetex-bin bug Bug#65432: tetex-bin: kpsewhich cannot find file fmtutil.cnf Bug#65608: marked as done (tetex-bin: suggest menu entry for xdvi) Bug#65608: tetex-bin: suggest menu entry for xdvi Bug#65825: tetex-base: Includes files that are also in the package texinfo Bug#65826: tetex-nonfree: seminar has moved to tetex-extra Bug#65827: tetex-nonfree: koma-script can move to tetex-extra Bug#65837: installing local .mf files Bug#65961: tetex-base/tetex-nonfree: serious license problems Bug#66024: tetex-base: New installation fails because preinst script fails for no apparent reason Bug#66025: tetex-base: Preinst fails Bug#66167: tetex-bin: install failed in preinst Bug#66167: tetex-extra has the same problem Bug#66283: broken preinst(?) Can texconfig wipeout a harddisk? Debian Bugs information: logs for Bug#61981 groff with metapost hebrew support in tetex debian package Holiday In what way tetex-maint work really? install probleme on i386 woody path separator of texmf.cnf Please test new tetex packages for woody Processed: bug in tetex-bin Processed: Fixed in NMU tetex-base 1.0.2-1 Processed: Fixed in NMU tetex-bin 1.0.7-1 Processed: Re: Bug#64470: pdflatex: I can't find the format file `pdflatex.fmt'! Processed: Re: Bug#64524: c-std.h contains declarations which conflict with stdio.h Processed: Re: Bug#65053: Can't install tetex-bin 1.0.6-7 Processed: Reopen 64177 Processed: seminar has moved to tetex-extra Processed: send 61981 Processed: Small cleanup at the bugs on tetex-base Processed: Small cleanup in the bugs on the tetex-* packages Re: Release-critical Bugreport for June 25, 2000 Solving the non-free issue for potato Some suggestions for the Debian tetex packages The Splitting of teTeX sponsor for pb-diagram and/or foiltex Re: Status of splitting out non-free parts of teTeX Re: tetex-base tetex-base in woody is bad what is tetex-supp/src-specials??? The last update was on 08:31 GMT Sat May 11. There are 174 messages. Page 1 of 1.
<<
[previous month] 		|<
[first page] 		<
[previous page] 		Page 1 of 1
 >
[next page] 		>|
[last page] 		>>
[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]
Mail converted by MHonArc