Re: The Splitting of teTeX
Nice one Christoph! Haven't looked in detail yet, though.
(And once potato is released, it would be really good to rename
tetex-lib according to policy at libkpathsea3.)
Just one point:
On Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 01:26:03PM -0700, C.M. Connelly wrote:
> * Source files
>
> Would tetex-src be split up, as well? Maybe as tetex-latex-base-src
> or tetex-latex-extras-src? Should the packaging more closely mirror
> the layout of CTAN? (Maybe split into tetex-latex-contrib-supported
> vs. tetex-latex-contrib-unsupported; although those names might imply
> that the support comes from Debian.)
I don't think it's worth the effort. The -src package only exists to
satisfy the requirements of some licenses, and if we have newer LaTeX
packages, we would have the LaTeX sources in the source package
there. It's a shame that there are no "source only" packages! If
people want source packages, they can use "apt-get source ...".
Julian
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see http://www.debian.org/~jdg
Donate free food to the world's hungry: see http://www.thehungersite.com/
Reply to: