Re: The Splitting of teTeX
"C.M. Connelly" <c@eskimo.com> writes:
[snip]
> * Naming of packages
>
> Obviously all these packages should be named something like
> tetex-polish, tetex-czech, tetex-latex-base, and so on; we might want
> to name the font packages something like tetex-font-yandy,
> tetex-font-type1, tetex-font-ams, and so on.
[snip]
Is there already a naming policy for additional latex packages. For
the debiandoc-sgml package I'm thinking of using some macros which are
not in tetex. My suggestion would be to simply call them latex-<foo>.
Also, do I need to do more in the postinst then running `mktexlsr`?
And where in the directory structure do I put these macros and their
documentation?
Thanks,
Ardo
--
Ardo van Rangelrooij
home email: ardo@chello.nl, ardo@debian.org
home page: http://home.flevonet.nl/~avrangel, http://www.debian.org/~ardo
PGP fp: 3B 1F 21 72 00 5C 3A 73 7F 72 DF D9 90 78 47 F9
Reply to: