debian-python Feb 2010 by date

[previous month]

[first page]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[last page]

[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Feb 01

Re: Ideal directory structure? Nicolas Chauvat
Re: binNMUs for python2.6 Yaroslav Halchenko

Feb 02

Requesting review of python-ctypeslib Richard Darst

Feb 03

Re: Debhelper 7, Python package, multiple binary packages Ben Finney
RFS: pynagram (updated package, 2nd attempt) Umang
Re: Requesting review of python-ctypeslib Kumar Appaiah

Feb 04

compiling python-qt4 for python 3.1 Fox Zohar

Feb 05

RFS: pyodbc Deepak Tripathi

Feb 07

RFS: django-lean Elliot Murphy

Feb 09

Re: RFS: pynagram (updated package, 2nd attempt) Umang

Feb 13

Re: RFS: django-lean Jakub Wilk
python2.6 vs python-json Jakub Wilk

Feb 14

Re: python2.6 vs python-json Paul Wise
Re: python2.6 vs python-json Barry Warsaw
Re: python2.6 vs python-json Alexandre Quessy

Feb 16

Re: python2.6 vs python-json Bernd Zeimetz
(again) Why default python is not 2.6 yet? Sandro Tosi
Re: python2.6 vs python-json Jakub Wilk
Re: (again) Why default python is not 2.6 yet? Cyril Brulebois

Feb 17

Re: (again) Why default python is not 2.6 yet? Sandro Tosi
Re: (again) Why default python is not 2.6 yet? Jakub Wilk
Re: (again) Why default python is not 2.6 yet? Michal Čihař
Re: (again) Why default python is not 2.6 yet? Sandro Tosi
Re: (again) Why default python is not 2.6 yet? Jakub Wilk
Re: (again) Why default python is not 2.6 yet? Cyril Brulebois
Re: (again) Why default python is not 2.6 yet? Rene Engelhard
Re: (again) Why default python is not 2.6 yet? Sandro Tosi
Re: (again) Why default python is not 2.6 yet? Rene Engelhard
Re: (again) Why default python is not 2.6 yet? Jakub Wilk

Feb 18

RFS: python-django-app-plugins -- A plugin system for django Deepak Tripathi
Re: RFS: python-django-app-plugins -- A plugin system for django Jakub Wilk
Re: RFS: python-django-app-plugins -- A plugin system for django Deepak Tripathi

Feb 19

Towards Python 2.6: Architecture:all & XS-P-V:current packages Jakub Wilk
Re: (again) Why default python is not 2.6 yet? Jakub Wilk
Re: Towards Python 2.6: Architecture:all & XS-P-V:current packages Sandro Tosi
Re: Towards Python 2.6: Architecture:all & XS-P-V:current packages Ludovico Cavedon
Re: Towards Python 2.6: Architecture:all & XS-P-V:current packages Piotr Ożarowski

Feb 20

Re: Towards Python 2.6: Architecture:all & XS-P-V:current packages Yaroslav Halchenko
Re: Towards Python 2.6: Architecture:all & XS-P-V:current packages Piotr Ożarowski

Feb 23

Re: Towards Python 2.6: Architecture:all & XS-P-V:current packages Yaroslav Halchenko

Feb 24

Re: Towards Python 2.6: Architecture:all & XS-P-V:current packages Yaroslav Halchenko

Feb 26

Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#571491: gdcm: FTBFS with Python 2.6 as default Mathieu Malaterre
Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#571491: gdcm: FTBFS with Python 2.6 as default Jakub Wilk

Feb 27

Subject: RFS: namebench (updated package, fix a FTBFS) Miguel Landaeta
Re: Subject: RFS: namebench (updated package, fix a FTBFS) Jakub Wilk

Feb 28

Re: RC severity for Python 2.6 related bugs Vincent Bernat
Re: RC severity for Python 2.6 related bugs Sandro Tosi
Re: RC severity for Python 2.6 related bugs Josselin Mouette
Re: RC severity for Python 2.6 related bugs Andreas Barth
Re: RC severity for Python 2.6 related bugs Jonathan Wiltshire
Re: RC severity for Python 2.6 related bugs Cyril Brulebois
Re: RC severity for Python 2.6 related bugs Andreas Barth
Re: RC severity for Python 2.6 related bugs Vincent Bernat
Re: RC severity for Python 2.6 related bugs Vincent Bernat
Re: RC severity for Python 2.6 related bugs Ben Finney
Re: RC severity for Python 2.6 related bugs Sandro Tosi
Re: RC severity for Python 2.6 related bugs Sandro Tosi

The last update was on 15:23 GMT Sun Aug 16. There are 57 messages. Page 1 of 1.