Re: (again) Why default python is not 2.6 yet?

[Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>]

* Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>, 2010-02-17, 14:58:
> Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org> (17/02/2010):
> > * Failures, which should be fixable by give-backs:
> >
> > jppy	amd64 armel i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 mips mipsel powerpc
> > twisted-runner	alpha amd64 armel i386 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 mips mipsel powerpc
>
> I think I've given twisted-runner back several times already, and even
> ended up marking it as Failed.

Apparently one of its build-dependencies needed a sourceful upload.

> I've given it back anyway, as well as jppy.

Oops, jppy still fails but in a different way: 
http://bugs.debian.org/569363

> > * Temporary(?) dependency problems:
> >
> > dballe/kfreebsd*
>
> Not temporary, B-D on libsqliteodbc, from src:sqliteodbc, which is
> uncompiled.

http://bugs.debian.org/570246

> > openscap/kfreebsd*
>
> Not temporary, B-D on libnl-dev, from src:libnl, which is uncompiled.

http://bugs.debian.org/570277

--
Jakub Wilk

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature