Re: (again) Why default python is not 2.6 yet?
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:05:56AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> If there is a valid, technical reason, please let us know, but as of
> now I can't see any.
Loads of RC bugfixes (partly on obsolete versions) waiting to enter testing
which would more blocked that it already is with the mips* buildd backlog.
> So, let's just change the default to 2.6, kindly ask Lucas to do an
> archive-wide rebuild (I'm pretty sure he'll be happy to support us,
> but not certan, hey we still have to ask him ;) ), and deal with the
> fallback.
For months. At which time we'll still have the completely obsolete OOo 3.1.1
(or whatever else example you find) in squeeze. No.
> Keep waiting and waiting is pointless, and does only harm for the
> target to support a stable release (there are very few people actively
That's true, though. But python's not alone in the world and if you did
it far earlier....
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70
`- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70
Reply to: