[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: non-free and users?

Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org> writes:

> On Jan 18, 2004, at 18:27, Sergey V. Spiridonov wrote:
>> Remi Vanicat wrote:
>>> "Sergey V. Spiridonov" <sena@hurd.homeunix.org> writes:
>>> In this case, I clearly disagree with you. By stopping to distribute
>>> non-free we will decrease the amount of good, and so act non-ethical.
>> Where is this good, which we will decrease? Do you think that
>> dropping non-free will broke the upstream copy, or it will destroy
>> the copy of those who downloded it? Where is the harm?
> There is no harm per se, however, there is the good we did not do
> (because we were no longer able).

we were never able to do it. Or we are able to do it (in case of a
GFDL like package for example).

Rémi Vanicat

Reply to: