Re: non-free and users?
Sergey V. Spiridonov wrote:
Exactly. I hope you do not think, that non-free software is a healing
No, I think it's more like a hammer.
This is the difference in our points. I think that non-free software is
dangerous and mostly evil like a narcotic and should be immediately
dropped. Your point is that it can be useful like a hammer and can be
promoted. I see no reason for you to change your mind and probably we
can not convince each other.
To be more precise: of course, narcotic or hammer can not be evil or
good without associtated human action. When I'm saying non-free software
is mostly evil, the associated action is "distributing by Debian". So
the complete phrase is "distributing by Debian non-free software is
Best regards, Sergey Spiridonov