Re: non-free and users?
"Sergey V. Spiridonov" <sena@hurd.homeunix.org> writes:
> Raul Miller wrote:
>
>>> I demostrate how one can start to distribute a program, continue to
>>> distribute a program and stop to distribute a program. All three
>>> actions do not contradict any ethical rule.
>>> If you still think that erasing something from my hard drive (free
>>> or non-free) is not ethical, please explain me how.
>> I just don't see what this has to do with having debian remove
>> non-free.
>> Sure, you can remove something from your hard drive. That's not
>> equivalent to removing packages in unstable which are there because of
>> someone else's work.
>
> I understand what you are talking about. There are Debain developers
> who want Debian to act always ethical, and there are Debian developers
> who think it is O.K. to act non-ethical for Debian, for example
> because of the work they contribute to non-free.
I feel somewhat insulted there. So me making a non-free package is
non-ethical ? so, when I help other to have the ocaml documentation
well integrated to there debian documentation system (dwww for
example), I'm acting non-ethical ?
I DO NOT AGREE THAT THIS IS THE CASE.
--
Rémi Vanicat
Reply to: