[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 09/17/2014 at 04:13 AM, Joel Rees wrote:

> Guys we've got better things to do than get sucked into this kind
> of quibbling.
> 
> Steve's working on alternatives to debian+systemd.* and I'm trying 
> to figure out what useful function systemd and friends really
> perform so that we can make something that the developers can use
> instead. Steve seems to be having more success than I.
> 
> (It looks like dbus was one of the wedges, and that stupid logging 
> daemon, but there's another one or two hiding somewhere. The
> wrecking crew have left us a lot of work, poisoning the well to
> make systemd appear essential.)

So far as I'm aware, the key other component appears to be handling
cgroups (AKA control groups), which is a relatively recent Linux kernel
feature that provides some nice process-management possibilities but
isn't available for (pretty much) any other OS. Or at least any
free/Free one.

There's now a separate 'cgmanager' package which provides a program
designed to handle cgroups separately from systemd, and there's code in
systemd-shim to hook in to cgmanager from the places where software
which expects the systemd implementation will be looking for cgroups
support. But that may well not be enough to satisfy all use cases, and
there do still seem to be bugs in some circumstances; help on that,
upstream, is probably welcome.

- -- 
   The Wanderer

Secrecy is the beginning of tyranny.

A government exists to serve its citizens, not to control them.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=Uq3G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: