Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > Please read my other posts. I have already refuted this twice. No, you haven't. >> Yup. Because look at the time; that was how things were written. The >> concepts we have now did not exist then. But if you look further in their >> papers you'll see they were more Deists (God exists but does not partake in >> this world) than the Theists of Christians today (God exists and takes an >> active, personal role in our lives). > Care to provide some citations? I did, I gave you the search. > Well, they clearly weren't founding a secular state, or they would not > have mentioned a creator. The point is that they recognized that human > rights came from something greater than humans. That greater thing is > God. That's because at the time there really was no widespread concept that the world could be anything but created! Do you understand how shocking a concept it was that a state did not endorse any religion was at the time? -- Steve C. Lamb | But who decides what they dream? PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | And dream I do... -------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature