More questions about T-bird (was Re: Problem with T-bird (was ...))
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 16:35 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
>> Ron Johnson wrote:
>>> Even sub-folders?
>> Not sure, never had a server that did subfolders so never really cared.
>> OTOH I did care that I tried prior to Thunderbird seemed capable of storing
>> sent mail on the server. Seemed dumb to me to force local folders for sent
>> mail, drafts and other such storage when one might just want to have access to
>> them from more than one client.
>>
>> So far in my recent tests (I'm a glutton for punishment) only Evolution
>> and Thunderbird seem capable of using IMAP in that fashion and Evolution fails
>> since it doesn't seem to talk IMAPS.
>
> After reading how much you like T-bird, I installed it and tried
> it. However, it does not let me use sendmail as the outgoing
> email method. That's... unbelievable.
Ok, I'm using T-bird now, since I'm trying out XFce4. But there are
a couple of things that Evo does that I can't find in T-bird.
Q1. How do you use a executable .signature (fortune, etc)?
Q2. I get my mail from an IMAP store that uses server-side
filtering. How do I tell T-bird to scan all folders for new
mail? Clicking on every folder gets old.
Thanks,
Ron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEbcxbS9HxQb37XmcRAmPkAJ9XFb4no+e0eyseKJ30Xz9CWpZGxgCg2/7T
lIGySGhEYh08xvwHgGsTlhQ=
=pE4q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: