debian-lsb Sep 2003 by author

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

---

Adam Starling

• LSB Compliance for Xandros Sep 05
• LSB Test Suite results for Sarge (Sept 5) Sep 08

Andreas Jaeger

• Re: [lsb-discuss] Re: FHS 2.3 beta Sep 30

Anthony Towns

• Re: Yet more reports Sep 25
• Re: LSB vs. Debian Policy Sep 01
• Re: Bug#186140: Bug#206210: diff: does not comply with LSB 1.3 (fwd) Sep 04
• Re: Bug#186140: Bug#206210: diff: does not comply with LSB 1.3 (fwd) Sep 03
• Re: Bug#186140: Bug#206210: diff: does not comply with LSB 1.3 (fwd) Sep 06
• Re: Yet more reports Sep 20
• Re: More LSB results available Sep 19
• Re: lsb bug tracking Sep 03
• Re: New lsbappchk package and arch strategy Sep 19
• Re: Yet more reports Sep 24

Christopher Yeoh

• Re: [lsb-discuss] Re: FHS 2.3 beta Sep 30
• Re: NEED HELP: Making woody LSB compliant Sep 09
• RE: LSB woody test results Sep 17
• Re: NEED HELP: Making woody LSB compliant Sep 09
• Re: LSB woody test results Sep 18
• FHS 2.3 beta Sep 11
• Re: LSB woody test results Sep 17
• Re: LSB Test Suite results for Sarge (Sept 5) Sep 09

Eduardo Manso

• unsubscribe Sep 03

Gerhard Tonn

• Re: LSB help needed for powerpc and s390 Sep 30

Jeff Licquia

• Yet more reports Sep 19
• Re: LSB woody test results Sep 18
• Re: LSB woody test results Sep 16
• LSB woody test results Sep 16
• Re: Yet more reports Sep 22
• Re: More LSB results available Sep 19
• LSB update and patch sites Sep 24
• Re: Yet more reports Sep 23
• More LSB results available Sep 18

Martin Godisch

• Re: LSB vs. Debian Policy Sep 01

Martin Michlmayr

• Re: FHS 2.3 beta Sep 30

Martin Schulze

• Re: NEED HELP: Making woody LSB compliant Sep 09

Matt Taggart

• Re: LSB Test Suite results for Sarge (Sept 5) Sep 08
• Debian LSB webpage updated Sep 16
• Re-ran tests on ia64 unstable Sep 30
• LSB help needed for powerpc and s390 Sep 30
• New lsbappchk package and arch strategy Sep 13
• Re: LSB update and patch sites Sep 30
• Re: Bug#186140: Bug#206210: diff: does not comply with LSB 1.3 (fwd) Sep 04
• lsb bug tracking Sep 03
• Re: LSB woody test results Sep 16

Michael Stone

• Re: Bug#186140: Bug#206210: diff: does not comply with LSB 1.3 (fwd) Sep 04
• Re: Bug#186140: Bug#206210: diff: does not comply with LSB 1.3 (fwd) Sep 04
• Re: Bug#186140: Bug#206210: diff: does not comply with LSB 1.3 (fwd) Sep 04
• Re: Bug#186140: Bug#206210: diff: does not comply with LSB 1.3 (fwd) Sep 04
• Re: Bug#186140: Bug#206210: diff: does not comply with LSB 1.3 (fwd) Sep 03
• Re: Bug#186140: Bug#206210: diff: does not comply with LSB 1.3 (fwd) Sep 04

Santiago Vila

• Re: Bug#186140: Bug#206210: diff: does not comply with LSB 1.3 (fwd) Sep 03
• Re: Bug#206210: diff: does not comply with LSB 1.3 Sep 04
• Re: Bug#206210: diff: does not comply with LSB 1.3 Sep 04

Stefan Gybas

• Re: Bug#186140: Bug#206210: diff: does not comply with LSB 1.3 (fwd) Sep 04
• Re: NEED HELP: Making woody LSB compliant Sep 09
• Re: Bug#186140: Bug#206210: diff: does not comply with LSB 1.3 (fwd) Sep 04
• Re: Bug#186140: Bug#206210: diff: does not comply with LSB 1.3 (fwd) Sep 04
• Re: Bug#186140: Bug#206210: diff: does not comply with LSB 1.3 (fwd) Sep 03
• Re: NEED HELP: Making woody LSB compliant Sep 09
• Re: Bug#186140: coreutils/lsb test suite Sep 08

Wichmann, Mats D

• RE: Yet more reports Sep 25
• RE: Bug#186140: Bug#206210: diff: does not comply with LSB 1.3 (fwd) Sep 03
• RE: Bug#186140: Bug#206210: diff: does not comply with LSB 1.3 (fwd) Sep 04
• RE: Bug#186140: Bug#206210: diff: does not comply with LSB 1.3 (fwd) Sep 06
• RE: LSB woody test results Sep 17

[previous month]

[first page]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[last page]

[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]