debian-lint-maint Jan 2018 by author

[previous page]

Page 2 of 2

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

---

Debian Bug Tracking System

• Bug#886210: marked as done (Downgrade "out-of-date-standards-version" to an info) Jan 09
• Processed: Re: lintian: PE security features false positives on 64-bit binaries Jan 08
• Bug#885432: marked as done (bugs-field-does-not-refer-to-debian-infrastructure for non-Debian packages) Jan 10
• Bug#886210: marked as done (Downgrade "out-of-date-standards-version" to an info) Jan 09
• Bug#886961: marked as done (lib-nss* packages should go in the admin section too) Jan 16
• Processed: Re: lintian: Please make missing-debian-source-format proper Jan 29
• Processed: Re: lintian: commiters' initials missing from d/copyright Jan 22
• Bug#710656: marked as done (lintian: apache2-deprecated-auth-config should check for IfVersion) Jan 01
• Bug#749202: marked as done (lintian: Should never suggest symbols files for Objective-C libraries) Jan 09
• Bug#887428: marked as done (lintian: Use of uninitialized value in string ne at /usr/share/perl5/Lintian/Collect/Package.pm line 579) Jan 21
• Processed: Re: lintian: please detect useless usage of the quilt dh addon Jan 08
• Processed: Re: lintian: Emit warnings for Alioth URLs in packaging (migration to Salsa) Jan 09
• Processed: Re: lintian: Please detect packages that currently needs R続!=no Jan 06
• Bug#885106: marked as done (lintian: Please update dh_commands for scour 0.36) Jan 28
• Processed: Re: lintian: does not report missing Depends: python3:any on python3-mimeparse_0.1.4-3_all.deb Jan 15
• Processed: Re: lintian: false positive spelling-error-in-description (duplicate word) on 'ORA (ORA Recursive Acronym)' Jan 26
• Processed: Re: lintian: version-substvar-for-external-package raised for dbgsym packages from same source Jan 12
• Bug#885910: marked as done (lintian: Please warn about packages that override dh_fixperms without calling dh_fixperms) Jan 01
• Processed: Re: lintian: warn about orphaned-package-not-maintained-in-debian.org-infrastracture Jan 02
• Processed: Re: lintian: FTBFS: apparently-corrupted-elf-binary check not being emitted Jan 25
• Processed: Re: Bug#888413: lintian: Don't consider README file under debian/patches as patch file Jan 25
• Processed: Re: lintian: False positive for source-is-missing build/js/bootstrap-datetimepicker.min.js Jan 27
• Processed: Re: lintian: Please detect packages that currently needs R続!=no Jan 07
• Processed: Re: lintian: False-positive brace-expansion-in-debhelper-config-file Jan 25
• Bug#795935: marked as done ([checks/changelog-file] please check for unabbreviated month/day-of-the-week names) Jan 01
• Processed: Re: lintian: confusing tag name: debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature Jan 23
• Bug#883772: marked as done (lintian: please don't map implementation language to sections) Jan 16
• Bug#886426: marked as done (lintian: reports unoverridable bugs in auto-created dbgsym packages) Jan 09
• Bug#886586: marked as done (lintian: Error processing asterisk-core-sounds/1.4.27-1/source on lindsay.d.o (and others)) Jan 09
• Processed: Re: lintian: source-is-missing false positive: correctly named directory in debian/missing-sources Jan 26
• Processed: Re: lintian: Unusual documentation package name, foo-docs Jan 30
• Processed: Re: lintian: extra-license-file should ignore sphinx _sources/license.txt Jan 01
• Processed: Re: lintian: Please warn about packages that ship (non-reproducible) Python Hypothesis example files Jan 02
• Bug#886101: marked as done (lintian: Please warn about packages that ship (non-reproducible) Python Hypothesis example files) Jan 09
• Processed: Re: Bug#884142: package-contains-compiled-glib-schema may be in error Jan 09
• Processed: lintian: introduce a inexistent-file-in-dep5-copyright rather confusing Jan 22
• Bug#886163: marked as done (lintian FTBFS on i386: fail tests::files-multiarch-foreign-files: output differs!) Jan 21
• Processed: Re: lintian: PE security features false positives on 64-bit binaries Jan 08
• Processed: tagging 505857 Jan 12
• Processed: Re: lintian: new pedantic check about planned features in package descriptions Jan 28
• Processed: Re: lintian: warn about empty fields in binary package control files Jan 28
• Bug#886219: marked as done (lintian should be less pedantic about latest policy version) Jan 09
• Processed: Re: lintian FTBFS on i386: fail tests::files-multiarch-foreign-files: output differs! Jan 19
• Bug#886555: marked as done (lintian: PE security features false positives on 64-bit binaries) Jan 09
• Bug#885693: marked as done (lintian: python-package-depends-on-package-from-other-python-variant should permit links to -doc packages) Jan 01
• Processed: Re: new tag unused-file-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright is rather confusing Jan 22
• Processed: Re: lintian: please report warning for debian/<pkg>.lintian-overrides.<arch> if pkg is M-A: same Jan 28
• Processed: Re: lintian: Error processing asterisk-core-sounds/1.4.27-1/source on lindsay.d.o (and others) Jan 09
• Bug#886219: marked as done (lintian should be less pedantic about latest policy version) Jan 09
• Processed: your mail Jan 29
• Processed: Re: Bug#886219: lintian should be less pedantic about latest policy version Jan 03
• Processed: Re: lintian: Warn if override_dh_auto_test target doesn't check for DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck Jan 29
• Processed: Re: lintian: another too generic python module file: /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/backports/__init__.py Jan 27
• Processed: Re: lintian: extra-license-file severity overblown? Jan 23
• Processed: Re: lintian: Should never suggest symbols files for Objective-C libraries Jan 02
• Processed: Re: lintian: Shouldn't warn about unknown template type "entropy" when a package depends on cdebconf Jan 01
• Processed: Re: lintian: do not warn about debian-control-has-obsolete-dbg-package for python-*-dbg packages Jan 03
• Bug#829100: marked as done (lintian: [patch] Warn about over-eagerly xz-compressed data.tar.xz) Jan 16
• Processed: Re: lintian: false positive: extra-license-file Jan 19
• Processed: Re: wildcard-matches-nothing-in-dep5-copyright should not be raised for deleted files Jan 10
• Processed: Re: lintian: detection of xfonts- packages as section fonts Jan 23
• Processed: Re: lintian: Detect non-free and contrib packages without a Disclaimer in debian/copyright Jan 30
• Processed: Re: lib-nss* packages should go in the admin section too Jan 12
• Bug#788991: marked as done (lintian: false positive on apache2-deprecated-auth-config due to strict check) Jan 01
• Bug#836771: marked as done (lintian: source-is-missing false positive: correctly named directory in debian/missing-sources) Jan 26
• Bug#859659: marked as done (lintian: version-substvar-for-external-package raised for dbgsym packages from same source) Jan 12
• Processed: Re: lintian: [checks/scripts] python-script-but-no-python-dep: contradictory description. Jan 01
• Bug#888074: marked as done (lintian FTBFS on armhf: spelling-error-in-binary false positives (?)) Jan 26
• Bug#735040: marked as done (lintian: confusing tag name: debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature) Jan 26
• Processed: Re: lintian: F-P package-contains-empty-directory with triggers Jan 22
• Bug#885968: marked as done (lintian: extra-license-file should ignore sphinx _sources/license.txt) Jan 01
• Bug#750537: marked as done (naive debian/rules parsing for python interpreter name) Jan 01
• Bug#887120: marked as done (lintian: check policy conformant use of /etc/skel directory) Jan 16
• Bug#886297: marked as done (lintian: false positive: autotools-pkg-config-macro-not-cross-compilation-safe) Jan 09
• Processed: Re: lintian: Detect upstream examples not shipped by the package Jan 30
• Processed: Re: lintian: warn about dh_systemd* overrides in c11 Jan 22
• Processed (with 11 errors): your mail Jan 28
• Processed: lintian: Please update dh_commands for scour 0.36 Jan 13
• Processed: Re: lintian: no detection of shell-script-fails-syntax-check Jan 01
• Bug#886479: marked as done (lintian: Please detect packages that currently needs R³!=no) Jan 09
• Bug#740118: marked as done (lintian: extra-license-file severity overblown?) Jan 26
• Processed: Re: lintian: python-foo-but-no-python3-foo false positive Jan 09
• Bug#648755: marked as done (lintian: arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share is probably to eager.) Jan 09
• Processed: Re: lintian: arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share is probably to eager. Jan 01
• Processed: Re: lintian: python-script-but-no-python-dep false positive Jan 23
• Processed: Re: lintian: W-shlibs-symbol-not-found: false positive Jan 12
• Processed: Re: lintian: Check for overrides that are missing an explanation Jan 30
• Processed: Re: lintian: Report when a Files-Excluded field is specified without a proper copyright-format Jan 27
• Processed: Re: please downgrade dependency-on-python-version-marked-for-end-of-life to info or pedantic Jan 03
• Bug#886271: marked as done (lintian: do not warn about debian-control-has-obsolete-dbg-package for python-*-dbg packages) Jan 09
• Processed: Re: Bug#795261: add a warning for stripped python-*-dbg packages Jan 03
• Processed: Re: lintian: check for patches present in debian/patches/ but missing from the series file Jan 21
• Bug#888304: marked as done (lintian: False-positive brace-expansion-in-debhelper-config-file) Jan 26
• Processed: Re: Bug#795261: add a warning for stripped python-*-dbg packages Jan 06
• Processed: Re: Bug#885974: lintian: warn about non-git Vcs fields Jan 01
• Processed: Re: lintian: reports unoverridable bugs in auto-created dbgsym packages Jan 06
• Bug#883719: marked as done (lintian: false positive spelling-error-in-description (duplicate word) on 'ORA (ORA Recursive Acronym)') Jan 26
• Processed: Re: Downgrade "old-standards-version" to an info Jan 03
• Bug#884142: marked as done (lintian: test for packages shipping /usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas/gschemas.compiled) Jan 09
• Processed: Re: lintian: Please error out on orig tarball sigs for source 1.0 Jan 29
• Bug#886574: marked as done (Results in false positives when watch file options contain \".) Jan 09
• Processed: Re: lintian: Pedantic check for co-maintained packages with no Vcs-* fields Jan 28
• Processed: Re: lintian: Pedantic check for packages using dpatch Jan 28
• Processed: Re: Downgrade "old-standards-version" to an info Jan 03
• Processed: forcibly merging 886219 886210 Jan 03
• Bug#810780: marked as done (lintian: license-problem-php-license is wrong when source comes from pecl.php.net) Jan 26
• Processed: Re: Bug#886219: lintian should be less pedantic about latest policy version Jan 03
• Processed: Re: lintian: warn about non-git Vcs fields Jan 04
• Bug#687141: marked as done (lintian: [checks/scripts] python-script-but-no-python-dep: contradictory description.) Jan 09
• Bug#770021: marked as done (lintian: check for FIXME) Jan 28
• Bug#886930: marked as done (lintian: Check that debian/copyright uses HTTPS in its format URI) Jan 16
• Processed: Re: lintian: Please recurse into .buildinfo to find .debs Jan 29
• Processed: Re: Bug#883772: lintian: please don't map implementation language to sections Jan 13
• Processed: Bug#505857 marked as pending Jan 12
• Processed: Re: Bug#886163 closed by Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org> (Bug#886163: fixed in lintian 2.5.68) Jan 17
• Bug#888456: marked as done (lintian: FTBFS: "apparently-corrupted-elf-binary" check not being emitted) Jan 26
• Processed: Re: lintian: Does not report inconsistencies between "files" and "checksum" sections in changes file Jan 29
• Bug#887083: marked as done (lintian: does not report missing Depends: python3:any on python3-mimeparse_0.1.4-3_all.deb) Jan 16
• Processed: Re: lintian: Possible improvement to description-synopsis-might-not-be-phrased-properly Jan 29
• Processed: Re: lintian: Check that "Files: *" is the first entry in DEP-5 copyright files Jan 28
• Bug#884502: marked as done (lintian: Pedantic check for packages modifying files outside of debian/) Jan 28
• Processed: Re: Bug#885106: lintian: Please update dh_commands for scour 0.36 Jan 13
• Bug#887715: marked as done (lintian: false positive: extra-license-file) Jan 21
• Bug#677870: marked as done (lintian: Shouldn't warn about unknown template type "entropy" when a package depends on cdebconf) Jan 09
• Bug#886163: marked as done (lintian FTBFS on i386: fail tests::files-multiarch-foreign-files: output differs!) Jan 09
• Bug#878609: marked as done (lintian: detection of xfonts- packages as section fonts) Jan 26
• Processed: Re: lintian: missing-notice-file-for-apache-license false positives Jan 04
• Processed: Re: lintian: Verify that .jar filename complies with Debian Java Policy Jan 29
• Bug#887899: marked as done (lintian: warn about dh_systemd* overrides in c11) Jan 26
• Processed: Re: lintian: Check that debian/copyright uses HTTPS in its format URI Jan 11
• Bug#888413: marked as done (lintian: Don't consider README file under debian/patches as patch file) Jan 26

Debian FTP Masters

• Processing of lintian_2.5.69_amd64.changes Jan 16
• Processing of lintian_2.5.67_amd64.changes Jan 01
• lintian_2.5.71_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Jan 21
• lintian_2.5.69_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Jan 16
• lintian_2.5.70_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Jan 16
• Processing of lintian_2.5.70_amd64.changes Jan 16
• Processing of lintian_2.5.72_amd64.changes Jan 26
• Processing of lintian_2.5.71_amd64.changes Jan 21
• lintian_2.5.68_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Jan 09
• Processing of lintian_2.5.67~bpo9+1_amd64.changes Jan 07
• Processing of lintian_2.5.68_amd64.changes Jan 09
• Processing of lintian_2.5.72_amd64.changes Jan 26
• lintian_2.5.67~bpo9+1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into stretch-backports Jan 07
• lintian_2.5.67_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Jan 01
• lintian_2.5.72_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Jan 26

Felix Lechner

• Bug#886036: Improve changelog version parsing Jan 05
• Bug#886036: Improve changelog version parsing Jan 01
• Bug#886036: Improve changelog version parsing Jan 01

Ferenc Wágner

• Bug#886343: lintian: missing-notice-file-for-apache-license false positives Jan 04
• Bug#886343: lintian: missing-notice-file-for-apache-license false positives Jan 05

Guillem Jover

• Bug#883772: lintian: please don't map implimentation language to sections Jan 13

Helmut Grohne

• Bug#787469: lintian: please report warning for debian/<pkg>.lintian-overrides.<arch> if pkg is M-A: same Jan 29

Hilmar Preuße

• Bug#887428: lintian: Use of uninitialized value in string ne at /usr/share/perl5/Lintian/Collect/Package.pm line 579 Jan 16
• Bug#887428: lintian: Use of uninitialized value in string ne at /usr/share/perl5/Lintian/Collect/Package.pm line 579 Jan 17
• Bug#887428: lintian: Use of uninitialized value in string ne at /usr/share/perl5/Lintian/Collect/Package.pm line 579 Jan 16

Holger Levsen

• Bug#886259: please downgrade dependency-on-python-version-marked-for-end-of-life to info or pedantic Jan 03
• Bug#886219: lintian should be less pedantic about latest policy version Jan 04
• Bug#886219: lintian should be less pedantic about latest policy version Jan 03

Ian Jackson

• Bug#886219: lintian should be less pedantic about latest policy version Jan 16
• Bug#886219: lintian should be less pedantic about latest policy version Jan 16

intrigeri

• Bug#754730: [lintian] packages should not depend on AppArmor Jan 15

Jakub Wilk

• Bug#831449: lintian on Sid amd64 reports volatile false spelling errors in binaries Jan 24

jenkins

• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2416 Jan 13
• Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_sid #2390 Jan 08
• Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_sid #2484 Jan 27
• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2498 Jan 29
• Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_stretch-backports #24 Jan 02
• Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_sid #2448 Jan 22
• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2469 Jan 23
• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2419 Jan 13
• Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_stretch-backports #128 Jan 29
• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2490 Jan 28
• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2401 Jan 09
• Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_buster #482 Jan 13
• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2368 Jan 03
• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2475 Jan 25
• Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_sid #2369 Jan 03
• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2502 Jan 30
• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2402 Jan 10
• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2387 Jan 07
• Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_sid #2489 Jan 28
• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2488 Jan 28
• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2400 Jan 09
• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2472 Jan 25
• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2353 Jan 02
• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2473 Jan 25
• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_stretch-backports #127 Jan 28
• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2404 Jan 10
• Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_sid #2492 Jan 28
• Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_sid #2417 Jan 13
• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2485 Jan 27
• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2487 Jan 28
• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_stretch-backports #46 Jan 04
• Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_sid #2495 Jan 28
• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2467 Jan 23
• Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_stretch-backports #47 Jan 04
• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2474 Jan 25
• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2494 Jan 28
• Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_sid #2503 Jan 30
• Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_sid #2405 Jan 10
• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2393 Jan 09
• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2399 Jan 09
• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2446 Jan 22
• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2386 Jan 07
• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2394 Jan 09
• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2441 Jan 21
• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_buster #459 Jan 05
• Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_sid #2476 Jan 26
• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_buster #537 Jan 28
• Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_buster #538 Jan 28
• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2470 Jan 24
• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2389 Jan 07
• Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_sid #2442 Jan 21
• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2468 Jan 23
• Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_sid #2420 Jan 13
• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2403 Jan 10
• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2500 Jan 29
• Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_buster #460 Jan 05
• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2385 Jan 07
• Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_sid #2395 Jan 09
• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_stretch-backports #23 Jan 01
• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2483 Jan 27
• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2415 Jan 13
• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2414 Jan 13
• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2388 Jan 07
• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2491 Jan 28
• Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_sid #2354 Jan 02
• Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_sid #2486 Jan 27
• Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_sid #2501 Jan 29
• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2447 Jan 22
• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_buster #481 Jan 13
• Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_sid #2499 Jan 29
• Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2471 Jan 24

Jeremy Bicha

• Bug#885974: lintian: warn about non-git Vcs fields Jan 01
• Bug#885974: lintian: warn about non-git Vcs fields Jan 01

Jonathan Carter (highvoltage)

• Bug#884142: package-contains-compiled-glib-schema may be in error Jan 09
• Bug#884142: package-contains-compiled-glib-schema may be in error Jan 09

Lilian Raymond

• [no subject] Jan 07

Mathieu Parent

• Bug#886961: lib-nss* packages should go in the admin section too Jan 11

Matthias Klose

• Bug#795261: add a warning for stripped python-*-dbg packages Jan 06

Mattia Rizzolo

• Re: [lintian] 01/01: Don't warn about extra license files installed via Sphinx. Thanks, Stuart Prescott! (Closes: #885968) Jan 01
• Bug#886271: lintian: do not warn about debian-control-has-obsolete-dbg-package for python-*-dbg packages Jan 03
• Bug#712394: lintian: Warn if override_dh_auto_test target doesn't check for DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck Jan 29
• Bug#888001: Bug#762261: lintian: introduce a inexistent-file-in-dep5-copyright rather confusing Jan 23
• Bug#886219: lintian should be less pedantic about latest policy version Jan 03
• Bug#795261: add a warning for stripped python-*-dbg packages Jan 03
• Bug#787469: lintian: please report warning for debian/<pkg>.lintian-overrides.<arch> if pkg is M-A: same Jan 28
• Bug#886219: lintian should be less pedantic about latest policy version Jan 03
• Bug#886566: lintian: please detect useless usage of the quilt dh addon Jan 07
• Bug#888001: Bug#762261: lintian: introduce a inexistent-file-in-dep5-copyright rather confusing Jan 23
• Bug#664520: [lintian] 04/06: Emit a warning about documentation packages that end with -docs. (Closes: #664520) Jan 30
• Bug#735040: lintian: confusing tag name: debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature Jan 23
• Bug#664520: [lintian] 04/06: Emit a warning about documentation packages that end with -docs. (Closes: #664520) Jan 30
• Bug#886303: lintian: python-foo-but-no-python3-foo false positive Jan 07
• Bug#735040: lintian: confusing tag name: debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature Jan 23
• Bug#795261: add a warning for stripped python-*-dbg packages Jan 03
• Bug#885974: lintian: warn about non-git Vcs fields Jan 01
• Bug#823190: lintian: Please error out on orig tarball sigs for source 1.0 Jan 29
• Re: [lintian] 01/01: checks/files.pm: Correct extra-license-check filename matching. Thanks Mattia! Jan 01
• Bug#762261: lintian: introduce a inexistent-file-in-dep5-copyright rather confusing Jan 22
• Bug#823190: lintian: Please error out on orig tarball sigs for source 1.0 Jan 29
• Bug#885974: lintian: warn about non-git Vcs fields Jan 01

Mike Hommey

• Bug#854209: Rewritting the license is not relicencing Jan 01

Neil Williams

• Bug#818609: lintian: python-script-but-no-python-dep false positive Jan 23

Nicolas Braud-Santoni

• Bug#886930: lintian: Check that debian/copyright uses HTTPS in its format URI Jan 11
• Bug#754730: [lintian] packages should not depend on AppArmor Jan 14

Niels Thykier

• Bug#886479: lintian: Please detect packages that currently needs R続!=no Jan 07
• [lintian] branch master updated (9ed7913 -> 368fe87) Jan 07
• Bug#887428: lintian: Use of uninitialized value in string ne at /usr/share/perl5/Lintian/Collect/Package.pm line 579 Jan 16
• Bug#888304: lintian: False-positive brace-expansion-in-debhelper-config-file Jan 24
• Bug#886096: lintian: Emit warnings for Alioth URLs in packaging (migration to Salsa) Jan 02
• Bug#886586: lintian: Error processing asterisk-core-sounds/1.4.27-1/source on lindsay.d.o (and others) Jan 07
• Re: [lintian] Membership audit and clean up - please follow up if you are still active Jan 13
• [lintian] 01/01: L::Path: Fix typo in documentation Jan 20
• [lintian] branch master updated (2937bc3 -> 2674a5a) Jan 20
• Re: [lintian] 04/07: Check for packages that specify binary dependencies on toolchain packages such as cdbs or debhelper. (Closes: #700953) Jan 29
• Bug#886479: lintian: Please detect packages that currently needs R続!=no Jan 07
• Bug#887817: lintian: check for patches present in debian/patches/ but missing from the series file Jan 20
• Bug#884498: lintian: Pedantic check for source format 1.0 packages Jan 28
• [lintian] 01/01: c/control-file: Fix inverted boolean logic Jan 07
• Bug#887124: lintian: Do not use new-package-should-not-package-python2-module on lintian.d.o Jan 14
• Re: [debhelper-devel] Bug#887899: overrides for dh_systemd_enable|start are silently ignored in compat 11 Jan 21
• Re: [lintian] 04/07: Check for packages that specify binary dependencies on toolchain packages such as cdbs or debhelper. (Closes: #700953) Jan 29
• [lintian] 01/01: t: Update legacy-filenames to cope with new check Jan 07
• [lintian] branch master updated (aaa04fa -> 9ed7913) Jan 07
• Bug#886479: lintian: Please detect packages that currently needs R続!=no Jan 07
• [lintian] branch master updated (f09687e -> e6e4198) Jan 10
• [lintian] branch master updated (368fe87 -> 3cb9668) Jan 07
• [lintian] 01/01: t: Bump minimum version of perl to 5.24 Jan 10
• Debian RT: Please update the lintian gid memberships Jan 13
• Bug#886586: lintian: Error processing asterisk-core-sounds/1.4.27-1/source on lindsay.d.o (and others) Jan 09
• Bug#886426: lintian: reports unoverridable bugs in auto-created dbgsym packages Jan 06
• Re: [lintian] 01/01: Ensure that bugs-field-does-not-refer-to-debian-infrastructure can be overridden by not emitting them for -dbgsym packages. Thanks to Thorsten Glaser for the report. (Closes: #886426) Jan 06
• Bug#888304: lintian: False-positive brace-expansion-in-debhelper-config-file Jan 25
• [rt.debian.org #7056]: Please update the lintian gid memberships Jan 13
• Bug#886479: lintian: Please detect packages that currently needs R³!=no Jan 06
• Bug#887817: lintian: check for patches present in debian/patches/ but missing from the series file Jan 20
• [lintian] 01/01: releases.md: Document how to update lintian.d.o Jan 07

Norbert Preining

• Bug#863384: lintian: check license-problem-gfdl-invariants is incorrect Jan 12

Osamu Aoki

• Bug#505857: lintian: false positive debian-watch-file-should-mangle-version Jan 12
• Bug#505857: tagging 505857 Jan 12

Paul Wise

• [lintian] 01/01: spelling: Add another correction Jan 13
• [lintian] 01/01: spelling: Add several corrections Jan 03
• [lintian] branch master updated (944533a -> 37ddbee) Jan 25
• [lintian] branch master updated (4d52dec -> 7b8251a) Jan 03
• [lintian] branch master updated (16c6c10 -> 543a6cb) Jan 13
• [lintian] 01/01: spelling: Add another correction Jan 23
• [lintian] 01/01: spelling: Add another correction Jan 17
• [lintian] branch master updated (4df4b67 -> b91bd57) Jan 23
• Bug#887817: lintian: check for patches present in debian/patches/ but missing from the series file Jan 20
• [lintian] 01/01: spelling: Add another correction Jan 24
• [lintian] branch master updated (9e11f42 -> 4701e70) Jan 15
• [lintian] branch master updated (c8226fe -> 273c688) Jan 18
• Bug#885995: lintian: check that gnome-shell extensions depend on the right gnome-shell version range Jan 01
• Bug#887817: lintian: check for patches present in debian/patches/ but missing from the series file Jan 20
• [lintian] branch master updated (a1ed857 -> d15de1a) Jan 20
• [lintian] branch master updated (b91bd57 -> 2f529ae) Jan 23
• [lintian] branch master updated (1d7d5f7 -> c8226fe) Jan 17
• [lintian] 01/01: spelling: Add several corrections Jan 18
• Bug#885995: lintian: check that gnome-shell extensions depend on the right gnome-shell version range Jan 01
• [lintian] branch master updated (2d71fba -> 1142b4c) Jan 24
• [lintian] 01/01: spelling: Add several corrections Jan 04
• [lintian] branch master updated (e00d723 -> 03879d3) Jan 04
• Bug#888809: lintian: VCS URLs and salsa.d.o Jan 30
• [lintian] 01/01: spelling: Add another correction Jan 20
• [lintian] 01/01: spelling: Add another correction Jan 23
• [lintian] branch master updated (273c688 -> ff69c71) Jan 18
• Bug#887120: lintian: check policy conformant use of /etc/skel directory Jan 14
• Bug#887120: lintian: check policy conformant use of /etc/skel directory Jan 14
• [lintian] 01/01: spelling: Add another correction Jan 25
• [lintian] 01/01: spelling: Add several corrections Jan 18
• [lintian] 01/01: spelling: Add another correction Jan 15

Piotr Ożarowski

• Bug#795261: add a warning for stripped python-*-dbg packages Jan 06

Raphael Geissert

• Bug#505857: lintian: false positive debian-watch-file-should-mangle-version Jan 12

Russ Allbery

• Bug#885042: Check inclusion of Apache 2.0 NOTICE files Jan 20
• Bug#885042: Check inclusion of Apache 2.0 NOTICE files Jan 20
• Bug#885042: Check inclusion of Apache 2.0 NOTICE files Jan 20
• Bug#885042: Check inclusion of Apache 2.0 NOTICE files Jan 02
• Bug#885042: Check inclusion of Apache 2.0 NOTICE files Jan 02
• Bug#885042: Check inclusion of Apache 2.0 NOTICE files Jan 02
• Bug#885042: Check inclusion of Apache 2.0 NOTICE files Jan 20
• Bug#885974: lintian: warn about non-git Vcs fields Jan 01
• Bug#885042: Check inclusion of Apache 2.0 NOTICE files Jan 20
• Bug#886219: lintian should be less pedantic about latest policy version Jan 04

Scott Kitterman

• Bug#887124: lintian: Do not use new-package-should-not-package-python2-module on lintian.d.o Jan 15
• Bug#886303: lintian: python-foo-but-no-python3-foo false positive Jan 04
• Bug#886303: lintian: python-foo-but-no-python3-foo false positive Jan 07
• Bug#886303: lintian: python-foo-but-no-python3-foo false positive Jan 07
• Bug#887124: lintian: Do not use new-package-should-not-package-python2-module on lintian.d.o Jan 14

Sean Whitton

• Bug#886219: lintian should be less pedantic about latest policy version Jan 03
• Bug#886258: Clarify whether or not the Standards-Version field must be present, or lower Lintian tag severity Jan 03
• Bug#886219: lintian should be less pedantic about latest policy version Jan 03
• Bug#886219: lintian should be less pedantic about latest policy version Jan 03

Stephen Kitt

• Bug#886555: lintian: PE security features false positives on 64-bit binaries Jan 07
• Bug#886555: lintian: PE security features false positives on 64-bit binaries Jan 08

Steve M. Robbins

• Bug#886210: Downgrade "old-standards-version" to an info Jan 03

Stuart Prescott

• Bug#885968: lintian: extra-license-file should ignore sphinx _sources/license.txt Jan 01
• Bug#885968: lintian: extra-license-file should ignore sphinx _sources/license.txt Jan 01

Theppitak Karoonboonyanan

• Bug#886297: lintian: false positive: autotools-pkg-config-macro-not-cross-compilation-safe Jan 04

Thomas Schmitt

• Bug#831449: lintian on Sid amd64 reports volatile false spelling errors in binaries Jan 24

Thorsten Glaser

• Bug#886426: lintian: reports unoverridable bugs in auto-created dbgsym packages Jan 05

Vasudev Kamath

• Bug#888413: lintian: Don't consider README file under debian/patches as patch file Jan 25
• Bug#888413: lintian: Don't consider README file under debian/patches as patch file Jan 25

Venite a Personal

• Hoy si! Cotice, porte y Ahorre Jan 04
• Cotice, compare, ahorre y porte - Jan 26

Vincent Bernat

• Bug#885042: Check inclusion of Apache 2.0 NOTICE files Jan 02
• Bug#885042: Check inclusion of Apache 2.0 NOTICE files Jan 02
• Bug#885042: Check inclusion of Apache 2.0 NOTICE files Jan 02

Ximin Luo

• Bug#887715: lintian: false positive: extra-license-file Jan 19

[previous month]

[first page]

[previous page]

Page 2 of 2

[next page]

[last page]

[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]