[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#887124: lintian: Do not use new-package-should-not-package-python2-module on lintian.d.o



Scott Kitterman:
> Package: lintian
> Version: 2.5.68
> Severity: normal
> 
> Dear Maintainer,
> 
> When new-package-should-not-package-python2-module appears on lintian.d.o, it
> is an unneeded distraction.  At this point it's no longer a new package.  Any
> future upload will 'fix' the issue since all this test does is check that
> there is only a single debian/changelog entry.
> 
> I can, sort of, see the utility of this, for new packages, to get the
> maintainer to consider if the new python2 package is really needed or not, but
> by the time lintian.d.o sees the package, it's too late.
> 
> Please supress this tag from lintian.d.o
> 
> Scott K
> 

Hi,

A different view: On occasion, we have pulled pre-releases on
lintian.d.o and that triggered a bug from people, who did not like that
fact that a local lintian and lintian.d.o disagreed on output.

  * If we supress that tag, we should be prepared for a bug requesting
    it to be undone for consistency with the locally installable
    lintian.


Secondly, lintian.d.o does not report what (tag visibility)
configuration it uses.  So it would be totally hidden for anyone
watching the website.  We start to do this for more than one tag, we
should probably look into exposing the current profile (as it is
defined) plus any relevant command-line options that affects the
visibility of tags.  (Bonus if tag page will mention that the tag is
suppressed/hidden).

Thanks,
~Niels


Reply to: