Re: Why is only the latest unstable package considered for testing?
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 03:54:06PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 01:30:27PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Yes, sure, easy for you to say. There are so many of them, and on such a
> > diversity of packages, i could be fixing bugs for weeks and not improve
> > the situation.
> Guess what people are trying to do. It's hunting season guys. It's
> bug-squashing *year*, OK?
Colin Watson [firstname.lastname@example.org]