Re: Why is only the latest unstable package considered for testing?
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 10:29:05PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Yes, but it is better than having our packages hold back by libvorbis
> and the 105 or so packages that will be breaken by its inclusion in
> testing, many of them have big RC bugs and such, and will not be
> includable in testing for a long time.
Could you please back your figures up with hard data? I was looking for
libvorbis stuff to NMU and had a time finding some. clanlib-vorbis still
needs porting though. I doubt we are talking about '105' packages
And in the end, those packages are *already* included in testing, no?
Just a/some version(s) behind.