Re: Why is only the latest unstable package considered for testing?
On Mon, Apr 14, 2003 at 03:14:21AM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> The DD who updated the 3.0 version into unstable should work to make
> sure it enters testing. Until it does they should not upload a less
> stable version. They should drive the process and not let the process
> drive them.
but often it is out of hiw hand.
BTW, do you know if uploading a package to testing-update will be
considered by the testing scripts if the unstable version is a new
version and/or too buggy and such ? This would be a neat way to
rebuilding a testing package which is holding back huge amount of other
packages and just needs a rebuild, but the unstable version is not
considered for this, since it depends on a huge amount of other (broken)