Adam McKenna <adam@flounder.net> writes: > The only "social cost" that I've seen semi-effectively argued so far > is that "some people think non-free is part of Debian". I've yet to > see a compelling argument as to why the remedy for this particular > problem is to remove non-free from our archive. Well, it seems clear to me that it would help remedy the problem. But I'm open to suggestions: do you have a better remedy to propose?