Re: Woody release - WHAT is current status
Previously James Troup wrote:
> Err, no, we told you repeatedly that rbuilder was a dead end. You
> ignored us[1] and now we're ``not co-operating'' by fixing the fucking
> mess the right way for you.
I didn't ignore you, I just didn't see any sign of an alternative so
continuing with rbuilder seemed the only viable option.
Wichert.
--
_________________________________________________________________
/wichert@wiggy.net This space intentionally left occupied \
| wichert@deephackmode.org http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: