debian-ci May 2018 by author

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Antonio Terceiro

Re: Changing the value of Maintainer field May 15
Re: Changing the value of Maintainer field May 13

Debian Bug Tracking System

Processed: Bug #897170 in autopkgtest marked as pending May 04
Processed: Bug #893595 in debci marked as pending May 26
Processed: Needs some documentation.... May 23
Bug#898014: marked as done (autopkgtest-pkg-python in Testsuite ignored if tests/control exists) May 06
Processed: Re: Bug#899386: autopkgtest: Assumes all binaries from a source are co-installable. May 23
Processed: bug 898340 is forwarded to https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/autopkgtest/merge_requests/10 May 10
Processed: Re: autopkgtest | add recommended packages to test dependencies when needs-recommends is defined (!12) May 17
Processed: Re: Bug#898727: Please provide adt-virt-* names, at least for buster May 15

gregor herrmann

Bug#867081: autopkgtest: @ no longer pulls in packages with versioned Provides May 04

Ian Jackson

Bug#898727: Please provide adt-virt-* names, at least for buster May 15
Re: Changing the value of Maintainer field May 15
Re: Changing the value of Maintainer field May 15
Re: Dealing with ci.d.n for package regressions May 08
Re: Dealing with ci.d.n for package regressions May 08
Bug#898727: Please provide adt-virt-* names, at least for buster May 15

Martin Pitt

Bug#899386: autopkgtest: Assumes all binaries from a source are co-installable. May 23
Re: autopkgtest results influencing migration from unstable to testing May 03
Bug#898727: Please provide adt-virt-* names, at least for buster May 15

Neil Williams

Bug#899386: Needs some documentation.... May 23
Bug#899386: Needs some documentation.... May 24
Bug#899386: autopkgtest: Assumes all binaries from a source are co-installable. May 23

Niko Tyni

Bug#867081: autopkgtest: @ no longer pulls in packages with versioned Provides May 19

Paul Gevers

Re: Changing the value of Maintainer field May 13
autopkgtest: versioned triggers and fixing "Test dependencies are unsatisfiable with using apt pinning" May 24
Bug#896698: autopkgtest | add recommended packages to test dependencies when needs-recommends is defined (!12) May 17
Re: ITM: Britney - autopkgtest integration plus create a hint file for elbrus May 02
Re: Changing the value of Maintainer field May 14
Bug#899386: Needs some documentation.... May 23
Re: autopkgtest results influencing migration from unstable to testing May 03
Re: Dealing with ci.d.n for package regressions May 08
Re: alternative dependencies May 06
failing SchrootRunner tests May 22
Re: Changing the value of Maintainer field May 15
Re: Dealing with ci.d.n for package regressions May 06

Rafael Laboissière

Re: Changing the value of Maintainer field May 14
Re: Changing the value of Maintainer field May 15
Changing the value of Maintainer field May 12
Re: Changing the value of Maintainer field May 13
Re: Changing the value of Maintainer field May 14
Re: Changing the value of Maintainer field May 16

Ralf Treinen

alternative dependencies May 06

Raphael Hertzog

Re: Changing the value of Maintainer field May 17

Russ Allbery

Bug#898014: autopkgtest-pkg-python in Testsuite ignored if tests/control exists May 06
Bug#898014: autopkgtest-pkg-python in Testsuite ignored if tests/control exists May 05

Simon McVittie

The last update was on 13:37 GMT Mon Jun 10. There are 49 messages. Page 1 of 1.

[previous month]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc