Hi Ian, On 08-05-18 14:10, Ian Jackson wrote: > Paul Gevers writes ("Re: Dealing with ci.d.n for package regressions"): >> On 04-05-18 15:24, Ian Jackson wrote: >>> I think therefore that tests should be triggered based, additionally, >>> on binary package dependencies as found in the archive. For every >>> binary package B which is produced by a source package S and depends >>> on another binary package D: tests of S should be retriggered for >>> updates to D. "Depends on" would probably mean "is mentioned as first >>> alternative in any Depends on Recommends requirement". This can be >>> determined from the published metadata without unpacking any source >>> packages or looking at Testsuite-Triggers. >> >> Let me ponder on this a bit more. > > Let me know what you think. I think I already wrote the answer in a later e-mail. Britney does this already directly. It doesn't need to use the Testsuite-Triggers for that. >> The code to calculate which packages are triggered lives here: >> https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/britney2/blob/master/britney.py >> (bfa02859 Line 334-340) > > Thanks. I haven't worked on Britney before. Can you point me to > instructions for testing changes to it ? https://release.debian.org/doc/britney/contributing-to-britney.html Paul
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature