Lucas Nussbaum <email@example.com> (2014-10-22): > On 17/10/14 at 10:01 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > But designing and tuning alternative proposals might take time, so I > > would prefer to wait a few days before reducing the discussion period, > > to ensure that we vote with a sensible ballot. I will decide in the > > middle of next week about that. > > I think that the current set of options would be a sensible ballot, and > I'm not aware of any discussions to add another option, so I'm inclined > to shorten the discussion period. For all I know/remember from the mails I read, it seems there was an agreement that this GR wouldn't affect jessie in any way. While I can sympathize with trying to reach a conclusion sooner than later, possibly sparing quite some mails, I'm not sure why there would be any need for any "rush". Can't we just let the usual timing apply? 1. https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2014/10/msg00319.html KiBi.
Description: Digital signature