[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Tentative summary of the amendments

Didier 'OdyX' Raboud <odyx@debian.org> (2014-10-22):
> Le mercredi, 22 octobre 2014, 13.34:27 Ian Jackson a écrit :
> > Jonas Smedegaard writes ("Re: Tentative summary of the amendments"):
> > > I too find it wrong to interpret Ian's text as a war between
> > > systemd and sysvinit - that's anything but "basically fine"!
> > 
> > It's only a war between systemd and sysvinit insofar as some of
> > systemd's proponents are trying to abolish everything except
> > systemd, which encompasses abolishing sysvinit.
> Can you _please_ point to such attempts or retract your unfounded FUD?

What about no?

Whether Ian is conducting a crusade for freedom/against tight coupling,
or is just unhappy about having "lost" the TC vote, or just acting in
good faith according to his deepest belief… doesn't matter much. Trying
to pin point who said exactly what, whether that's FUD, or just inexact,
or twisted, or whatever… doesn't matter much either.

There were several *thousands* of mails on that topic, it seems far
enough to me.

A GR process has been started, let's let people come up with their
amendments, let's vote and be done with it until the next episode.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: