Didier 'OdyX' Raboud <firstname.lastname@example.org> (2014-10-22): > Le mercredi, 22 octobre 2014, 13.34:27 Ian Jackson a écrit : > > Jonas Smedegaard writes ("Re: Tentative summary of the amendments"): > > > I too find it wrong to interpret Ian's text as a war between > > > systemd and sysvinit - that's anything but "basically fine"! > > > > It's only a war between systemd and sysvinit insofar as some of > > systemd's proponents are trying to abolish everything except > > systemd, which encompasses abolishing sysvinit. > > Can you _please_ point to such attempts or retract your unfounded FUD? What about no? Whether Ian is conducting a crusade for freedom/against tight coupling, or is just unhappy about having "lost" the TC vote, or just acting in good faith according to his deepest belief… doesn't matter much. Trying to pin point who said exactly what, whether that's FUD, or just inexact, or twisted, or whatever… doesn't matter much either. There were several *thousands* of mails on that topic, it seems far enough to me. A GR process has been started, let's let people come up with their amendments, let's vote and be done with it until the next episode. KiBi.
Description: Digital signature