debian-vote Oct 2014 by date
[Thread Index]
[Subject Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
Oct 16
Oct 17
Oct 18
Oct 19
Oct 20
- Re: Alternative proposal: reaffirm maintainers technical competence over the software they maintain Gergely Nagy
- Re: Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems Steve Langasek
- Re: Alternative proposal: support for alternative init systems is desirable but not mandatory Nikolaus Rath
- Re: Alternative proposal: support for alternative init systems is desirable but not mandatory Nikolaus Rath
- Re: [Call for seconds] The “no GR, please“ amendement. Charles Plessy
- Re: Amendment (Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems) Ian Jackson
- Re: GR option text on ballots Ian Jackson
- Re: Amendment (Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems) Alessio Treglia
- Re: Alternative proposal: support for alternative init systems is desirable but not mandatory Jonas Smedegaard
- Re: [Call for seconds] The “no GR, please“ amendement. Holger Levsen
- Re: [Call for seconds] The “no GR, please“ amendement. Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
- Re: [Call for seconds] The “no GR, please“ amendement. Raphael Hertzog
- Re: [Call for seconds] The “no GR, please“ amendement. Neil McGovern
- Re: [Call for seconds] The “no GR, please“ amendement. Gergely Nagy
- Re: Alternative proposal: support for alternative init systems is desirable but not mandatory Russ Allbery
- Re: [Call for seconds] The “no GR, please“ amendement. Cyril Brulebois
- Re: Alternative proposal: reaffirm maintainers technical competence over the software they maintain Cyril Brulebois
- Re: Alternative proposal: reaffirm maintainers technical competence over the software they maintain Paul Tagliamonte
- Re: [Call for seconds] The “no GR, please“ amendement. Paul Tagliamonte
- Re: Alternative proposal: support for alternative init systems is desirable but not mandatory Ian Jackson
- Re: Alternative proposal: support for alternative init systems is desirable but not mandatory Jonas Smedegaard
- Re: [Call for seconds] The “no GR, please“ amendement. Joey Hess
- Re: Alternative proposal: support for alternative init systems is desirable but not mandatory Martinx - ジェームズ
- Re: Alternative proposal: reaffirm maintainers technical competence over the software they maintain Ansgar Burchardt
- Re: Alternative proposal: reaffirm maintainers technical competence over the software they maintain Neil McGovern
- Re: Alternative proposal: reaffirm maintainers technical competence over the software they maintain Joey Hess
- Re: [Call for seconds] The “no GR, please“ amendement. Neil McGovern
- Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems Joey Hess
- Re: Alternative proposal: reaffirm maintainers technical competence over the software they maintain Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
- Re: [RFC] Alternative proposal: reaffirm upstream and maintainers technical competence over the software they maintain Sam Hartman
- Re: Alternative proposal: reaffirm maintainers technical competence over the software they maintain Matthias Urlichs
- Re: Alternative proposal: support for alternative init systems is desirable but not mandatory Sam Hartman
- Re: Alternative proposal: reaffirm maintainers technical competence over the software they maintain Russ Allbery
- Re: Alternative proposal: support for alternative init systems is desirable but not mandatory Joey Hess
- Re: Alternative proposal: reaffirm maintainers technical competence over the software they maintain Aigars Mahinovs
- Re: Alternative proposal: reaffirm maintainers technical competence over the software they maintain Kurt Roeckx
- Re: GR option text on ballots Kurt Roeckx
- Re: [Call for seconds] The “no GR, please“ amendement. Sam Hartman
- Re: Alternative proposal: reaffirm maintainers technical competence over the software they maintain Arno Töll
- Re: Alternative proposal: reaffirm maintainers technical competence over the software they maintain Kurt Roeckx
- Re: Alternative proposal: reaffirm maintainers technical competence over the software they maintain Sam Hartman
- Re: Alternative proposal: reaffirm maintainers technical competence over the software they maintain Joey Hess
- Re: Alternative proposal: reaffirm maintainers technical competence over the software they maintain Lucas Nussbaum
- Re: Alternative proposal: reaffirm maintainers technical competence over the software they maintain Paul Tagliamonte
- Re: GR option text on ballots Neil McGovern
- Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems ss-composer
- Re: Amendment (Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems) Neil McGovern
Oct 21
Oct 22
- Re: [Sorry Neil] Wording modification of the The ???no GR, please??? amendement. Holger Levsen
- Re: [Sorry Neil] Wording modification of the The ???no GR, please??? amendement. Sam Hartman
- Re: Tentative summary of the amendments Nikolaus Rath
- Re: [Sorry Neil] Wording modification of the The ???no GR, please??? amendement. Matthias Urlichs
- Re: [Sorry Neil] Wording modification of the The ???no GR, please??? amendement. Lucas Nussbaum
- Re: [Sorry Neil] Wording modification of the The ???no GR, please??? amendement. Philip Hands
- Re: Tentative summary of the amendments Jonas Smedegaard
- Re: [Sorry Neil] Wording modification of the The ???no GR, please??? amendement. Neil McGovern
- Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems Sergey Vlasov
- Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems Neil McGovern
- Re: Tentative summary of the amendments Ian Jackson
- Re: [Sorry Neil] Wording modification of the The ???no GR, please??? amendement. [and 1 more messages] Ian Jackson
- Re: Tentative summary of the amendments Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
- Re: [Sorry Neil] Wording modification of the The ???no GR, please??? amendement. Cyril Brulebois
- Re: Maximum term for tech ctte members Stefano Zacchiroli
- Re: Alternative proposal: support for alternative init systems is desirable but not mandatory Lucas Nussbaum
- Re: Tentative summary of the amendments Lucas Nussbaum
- Re: Reducing the discussion and the voting period to 1 week Lucas Nussbaum
- Re: Reducing the discussion and the voting period to 1 week Luca Falavigna
- Re: Reducing the discussion and the voting period to 1 week Ian Jackson
- Re: Alternative proposal: support for alternative init systems is desirable but not mandatory Russ Allbery
- Re: Tentative summary of the amendments Cyril Brulebois
- Re: Reducing the discussion and the voting period to 1 week Cyril Brulebois
- Re: Tentative summary of the amendments Uoti Urpala
- Re: Tentative summary of the amendments Aigars Mahinovs
- Re: Tentative summary of the amendments Joey Hess
- Re: [Sorry Neil] Wording modification of the The ???no GR, please??? amendement. Anthony Towns
- Re: [Call for seconds] The “no GR, please“ amendement. Moritz Mühlenhoff
- Re: Reducing the discussion and the voting period to 1 week Charles Plessy
Oct 23
Oct 24
Oct 25
Oct 26
Oct 27
Oct 28
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Uoti Urpala
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Anthony Towns
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] The Wanderer
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Russ Allbery
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] The Wanderer
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Aigars Mahinovs
- `systemd --system` as a viable way out of the systemd debate? Richard Hartmann
- Re: `systemd --system` as a viable way out of the systemd debate? Josselin Mouette
- Re: Running systemd with PID != 1, coexisting with other inits Gerrit Pape
- Re: `systemd --system` as a viable way out of the systemd debate? Aigars Mahinovs
- Re: `systemd --system` as a viable way out of the systemd debate? Andreas Florath
- Re: `systemd --system` as a viable way out of the systemd debate? Josh Triplett
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Russ Allbery
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Aigars Mahinovs
- Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Ian Jackson
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] The Wanderer
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Josselin Mouette
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Russ Allbery
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Sam Hartman
Oct 29
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Philip Hands
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Josselin Mouette
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Ian Jackson
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Neil McGovern
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Aigars Mahinovs
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Ian Jackson
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Ian Jackson
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Neil McGovern
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Marco d'Itri
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Neil McGovern
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Holger Levsen
- Re: `systemd --system` as a viable way out of the systemd debate? Matthias Urlichs
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Ian Jackson
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Adam D. Barratt
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Matthias Urlichs
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Ondřej Surý
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes Nikolaus Rath
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Josh Triplett
Oct 30
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Marco d'Itri
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Russ Allbery
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Aigars Mahinovs
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Florian Lohoff
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Jonathan Dowland
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Florian Lohoff
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes Tristan Van Berkom
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Matthias Urlichs
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Adam D. Barratt
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Miles Fidelman
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Aigars Mahinovs
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Cameron Stewart
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Aigars Mahinovs
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Josh Triplett
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Jeroen Dekkers
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Jonathan Dowland
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes Nikolaus Rath
- Re: Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Svante Signell
- Re: Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Paul Wise
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Matthias Urlichs
- Can you all please stop? Andrey Rahmatullin
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Jonas Smedegaard
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Jordan Metzmeier
- Re: Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Svante Signell
- Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the amendments] Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Oct 31
The last update was on 21:40 GMT Sun Aug 16. There are 481 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[Thread Index]
[Subject Index]
[Author Index]
[Other Debian Lists]
[Debian Home]
Mail converted by MHonArc