Re: Call for votes for the Condorcet/Clone proot SSD voting methodsGR
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 10:24:41AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> The idea is that non-voting geeks don't need to care about this
> vote, anyway. All of the changes we're making are procedural, not
> structural. Both the quorum changes and the supermajority changes should
> have the same result as the current two-vote system (a vote with multiple
> options that ignores supermajority/quorum, followed by a vote about the
> winning option with just Yes/No/FD that takes supermajority & quorum
> into account) in all reasonable circumstances.
Thanks. This is the kind of information that I find useful in making a
decision about the issue.
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>