Re: Call for votes for the Condorcet/Clone proot SSD voting methodsGR
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 01:47:29PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Enforced voting in order to ensure quorum is precisely an outcome I
> *don't* want. Lack of quorum indicates lack of interest in the issue,
> and such a lack of interest should be given appropriate consideration.
> Requiring uninterested parties to vote "all ones" for purposes of quorum
> would give a victory to whichever of the insignificant minority
> groups has the largest turnout.
To be honest I wonder if this GR is only going to pass because of
indifference. I wonder how many developers have actually read through
the GR and understand it. I'm amazed at how little explanation there has
been aimed at the non-voting geeks.
I wonder how it would stand up to the scrutiny of a lot more eyes.
There still seem to be some unresolved issues.
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>