Re: testing-dedicated ML? ( was Re: End of hypocrisy ? )
On 7/22/14, Zenaan Harkness <zen@freedbms.net> wrote:
> On 7/22/14, David Guntner <david@guntner.com> wrote:
>> Tom H grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
>>> There is one
>>>
>>> https://lists.debian.org/debian-testing/
>>>
>>> but a quick look at the its archives shows that it isn't a heavily
>>> used list and that it's not a list for freaking out about systemd.
>>
>> Neither is this one, but that doesn't seem to stop people.... :-)
>
> :)
>
> It is the point too though, and I think a point made very well.
> And I think it would be perfectly effective. eg:
>
> - This *is* debian 'testing' list - if you're not up to testing, or it
> gets too hot around here, please, go back to stable.
>
> - This *is* debian 'unstable' list - what is your expectation of
> transitioning new software into debian 'testing'?
>
> - This *is* debian stable list - what are you doing complaining about
> debian testing/ unstable?
>
> _That_ has got to be about the perfect response to certain <ahem>
> "complaints" shall we call them :)
>
> It would require a concensus to 'activate' the debian-testing list. Is
> there a debian-unstable - or perhaps that should just be part of
> debian-testing?
>
> Or is it all too much, too many lists?
>
> The idea seems quite appealing to me.
Since debian-testing is for devs, perhaps debian-users-notstable@?
Reply to: