Re: testing-dedicated ML? ( was Re: End of hypocrisy ? )
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 11:58 AM, <berenger.morel@neutralite.org> wrote:
> Le 21.07.2014 15:31, Slavko a écrit :
>>
>> it seems, that there can good idea to provide separate ML for testing
>> users.
>
> I agree, since testing is not for normal users (well... theoretically at
> least), so we could imagine that different MLs for (beta-)testing and
> productive usage (questions about "how to do..." and stable related bugs
> would go there, I guess).
> Now, I have no idea about the complexity of maintaining a new ML. Maybe
> there are also problems because some issues can not clearly affect only one
> of both testing and stable?
There is one
https://lists.debian.org/debian-testing/
but a quick look at the its archives shows that it isn't a heavily
used list and that it's not a list for freaking out about systemd.
Reply to: