[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: how to increase through put of LAN to 1GB



Le Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:32:11 +0500,
Muhammad Yousuf Khan <sirtcp@gmail.com> a écrit :

> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 5:28 PM, bruno.debian@cyberoso.com
> <bruno.debian@cyberoso.com> wrote:
> > Le Thu, 21 Jun 2012 06:00:10 -0500,
> > Stan Hoeppner <stan@hardwarefreak.com> a écrit :
> >
> >> On 6/21/2012 5:28 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
> >>
> >> > agreed, but my virtualization system is 4 core xeon 2.3 with 8 GB
> >> > RAM. 500 GB sata RAID 1 so i think hardware will not be a problem
> >>
> >> You keep mentioning all your hardware specs but what counts most:
> >>
> >> THE NIC
> >>
> >> > only 1 switch which is 1 GB supported and linsys switch 48 port
> >> > manageable L2 switch
> >>
> >> Does it support jumbo frames?  Post model# please.
> >>
> >> > standard windows share/samba  i think it uses TCP (not sure)
> >>
> >> Samba uses TCP because its protocol is CIFS/SMB, which use TCP.
> >>  Samba doesn't speak TCP.  CIFS/SMB are two layers up the OSI
> >> stack.  They you can't "tune" Samba's network performance.  You
> >> can only tune Linux' TCP performance, and Samba will benefit.
> >>
> >> You're asking a technical question on a technical mailing list.
> >> Please always post all technical details related to an issue.  Thus
> >> far you have not.  As a rule, it's better to post too much
> >> information that not enough.
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >
> > Is the problem really the network? If you tested your thoughput
> > c200 to 300 Mbpsopying a file, then I guess the bottleneck is your
> > hard drive. Your 200 to 300 Mbps correspond to your disk throughput
> > in my opinion. Try to use iperf to test your network throughput,
> > and be well aware that your disk io will be the real bottleneck
> > here.
> sorry i got your question wrong sorry for my weakenlish
> 
> correct me if i am wrong becuase the drives that i baught has default
> 3 GB througput do you still thing
> drives could be the bottleneck here?
> 
> >
> > Bruno
> >
> >
> > --
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> > listmaster@lists.debian.org Archive:
> > [🔎] 20120621142848.6cb5502d@bruno.vf-online.local">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 20120621142848.6cb5502d@bruno.vf-online.local
> >

3Gb/s is the sata bus maximum speed, not the drive real throughput.
See
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/wd6000hlhx-velociraptor-600gb,2600-5.html,
you'll see the maximum real througput for the velociraptor 600GB is 157
MB (~ 1,2 Gb/s), which is rarely obtained anyway in real life
(concurrent reading, access time, ... see
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/wd6000hlhx-velociraptor-600gb,2600-7.html).

So I bet your 200/300Mb/s are just corresponding to your disk
throughput (We actually have the same on our server at work with a
RAID 10 with 4 x 1TB WD caviar drives).

Kind regards,

Bruno


Reply to: