Re: Mozilla/Firefox "PostScript/default" security problems
Jacob S.(stormspotter@6texans.net) is reported to have said:
> On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 18:29:39 -0400
> Travis Crump <pretzalz@techhouse.org> wrote:
>
> > Brad Sims wrote:
> > >
> > > I am, I was told that mozilla no longer supports direct printing,
> > > and the lack of postscript wasn't a bug and they closed my
> > > bugreport.
> > >
> >
> > Upstream still supports directs printing, at least as of Sunday. It
> > may be that you can't enable both direct printing and xprint at the
> > same time, and so the debian maintainer had to make a choice as to
> > which is more useful.
>
> No, wouldn't be that, either. I'm running Testing, current as of today,
> and Firefox 0.8 is showing me options of "Postscript/default" as well as
> a couple of xprint variations. (Firefox was not installed via apt-get.)
>
I am also running firefox 0.8 but it was installed with apt-get. I am
stuck with Xprint with no postscript/default. :-(
Wayne
--
Computers follow your orders, not your intentions.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to: