On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 20:52:37 -0400 Wayne Topa <brittman@capital.net> wrote: > Jacob S.(stormspotter@6texans.net) is reported to have said: > > On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 18:29:39 -0400 > > Travis Crump <pretzalz@techhouse.org> wrote: > > > > > Brad Sims wrote: > > > > > > > > I am, I was told that mozilla no longer supports direct > > > > printing, and the lack of postscript wasn't a bug and they > > > > closed my bugreport. > > > > > > > > > > Upstream still supports directs printing, at least as of Sunday. > > > It may be that you can't enable both direct printing and xprint at > > > the same time, and so the debian maintainer had to make a choice > > > as to which is more useful. > > > > No, wouldn't be that, either. I'm running Testing, current as of > > today, and Firefox 0.8 is showing me options of "Postscript/default" > > as well as a couple of xprint variations. (Firefox was not installed > > via apt-get.) > > > > I am also running firefox 0.8 but it was installed with apt-get. I am > stuck with Xprint with no postscript/default. :-( I would recommend either downgrading via .debs from snapshot.debian.org, as mentioned in a similar thread on this list, or download the latest Firefox tarball from Mozilla.org and use the equivs package to let Debian know what version you have installed. Hopefully we'll get Postscript support back in Debian's Mozilla/Firefox soon. Jacob -- GnuPG Key: 1024D/16377135 Random .signature #56: Windows hasn't increased computer literacy. It's just lowered the standard.
Attachment:
pgpRHFVuRCWCc.pgp
Description: PGP signature