Re: Sawfish - keybinding funny.
On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 01:54, Gregory Seidman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 12:52:46AM +1000, Richard Heycock wrote:
> } On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 23:51, Gregory Seidman wrote:
> } > On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 11:22:59PM +1000, Richard Heycock wrote:
> } > } On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 21:15, Gregory Seidman wrote:
> [...]
> } > I have several shell commands bound to keys (e.g. xscreensaver-command
> } > -lock), and they work fine. I have had some path issues on occasion, so try
> } > giving the full path rather than just the command.
> }
> } Tried that. The same. To recapitulate. I've tried it:
> }
> } * not using a path
> } * using the full path
> } * using the inbuilt Xterm command.
> }
> } All the same. I don't even know how to go about debugging it. Having
> } said that I just tried strace'ing sawfish and guess what it works every
> } time. I hate stuff like this.
> }
> } So does this mean that it's not sawfish at fault, is it one of the
> } libraries? Mutter, Mutter...
> }
> } Could you check that these are the same:
> [...]
>
> Other than the hex in parens, they are the same. I don't know what the hex
> numbers signify but, with the exception of librep and /lib/ld-linux.so.2,
> yours are all higher than mine. In fact, they are all higher by either
> 0x1000 or 0x3000. I have no idea what that signifies.
It's the address of where it resides in memory.
>
> } I'm running out of ideas here.
>
> I don't have any better ideas either, I'm afraid. Try apt-get install
> --reinstall on sawfish and those various libraries?
I think you probably right I'll give it a go.
rgh
>
> [...]
> } rgh
> --Greg
--
"It is possible to make things of great complexity out of things
that are very simple. There is no conservation of simplicity"
-- Stephen Wolfram
Richard Heycock <rgh@roughage.com.au>
key fingerprint : 909D CBFA C669 AC2F A937 AFA4 661B 9D21 EAAB 4291
Reply to: