Re: cc oder to - richtig oder falsch oder beides ok ?
Am Do, 10. Mär 2011 um 12:55:17 +0100 schrieb Bjoern Meier:
> Am 10. März 2011 12:17 schrieb Robert Grimm <lists@news.robgri.de>:
>> http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful.html
> So, noch jemand Vorschläge warum das reply-to NICHT auf die ML gehört?
Ich zitiere von der Webseite:
,----
| ...
| Chip Rosenthal wrote a fine document entitled 'Reply-To' Munging
| Considered Harmful.
| ...
| In 2000 (or maybe earlier), Simon Hill wrote a response called Reply-To
| Munging Considered Useful
| ...
| People still using these two documents to debate the issue are wasting
| everybody's time. The issue was definitively settled in 2001, and Chip
| won.
| ...
| The IETF settles things
| ...
| In April of 2001, the IETF issued af new document, RFC 2822, which
| obsoletes RFC 822. In this new RFC, the author addresses the Reply-To
| header field in a few places, but the most relevant to this discussion
| is the following in section 3.6.2 "Originator fields":
|
| When the "Reply-To:" field is present, it indicates the mailbox(es)
| to which the author of the message suggests that replies be sent.
|
| Your list software is not "the author of the message", so it must
| not set or in any way meddle with the Reply-To header field. That
| field exists for the author and the author alone. If your list
| munges it, you are violating the standard.
`----
Gruß und EOD
Dirk
Reply to: