Re: Inconsistent spelling of QT and GNOME
Christian Kurz writes:
> On 04/11/01, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 09:39:25PM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > > On 04/11/01, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> > > > Indeed. Historically, debian-qa have been the people who deal with
> > > > orphaned packages - there are moves to make the BTS-generated traffic
> > > Well, but not only time is changing and I think it's time that debian-qa
> > > changes a bit moving away from the maintaince of orphaned packages to
> > > take care of QA issues.
> > It seems that part of the problem with this has been that most of what
> > would be done by -qa has actually happened on -devel or the ports lists
> > - there is not that much that is specifically the buisness of -qa.
> Then do as I suggested in an other email and remove this list after
> debian-qa-packages has been created. According to your description this
> list will then be useless and have no further relevant traffic, so that
> everything can be moved to -devel.
This list has a certain amount of traffic from maintainers who want
help with packages, or people wanting packages NMU'd.
Rapun.sel - outermost outpost of the Pick Empire