Lars Wirzenius writes ("Re: Conflict escalation and discipline"):
Most of the problems being discussed right now, and in general, seem
to be of the sort where feelings are hurt, but harassment isn't
happening. The situations seem to be "A did something, and B was
offended, how do we get A and B to understand each other, and resolve
any conflict, and get A and B to collaborate in the future?".
This implies to me that, at the least, "anti-harassment" is the wrong
name for a team that deals with this.
That's certainly true. I thought of these ideas:
all @debian.org
trouble too vague, also negative
behaviour seems somehow hostile, also vague
conduct seems somehow hostile, also vague
appeals too strongly advertises judicial function
arbitration too strongly advertises judicial function
upset can minimise and subjectify bad actions
conflict very negative
resolution too vague but at least positive
reconciliation not attractive to complaints who want action
dispute[s] maybe?