Re: Conflict escalation and discipline, name
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 10:56:41AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 03:51:48PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> >Lars Wirzenius writes ("Re: Conflict escalation and discipline"):
> >>Most of the problems being discussed right now, and in general, seem
> >>to be of the sort where feelings are hurt, but harassment isn't
> >>happening. The situations seem to be "A did something, and B was
> >>offended, how do we get A and B to understand each other, and resolve
> >>any conflict, and get A and B to collaborate in the future?".
> >>
> >>This implies to me that, at the least, "anti-harassment" is the wrong
> >>name for a team that deals with this.
> >
> >That's certainly true. I thought of these ideas:
> >
> >all @debian.org
> > trouble too vague, also negative
> > behaviour seems somehow hostile, also vague
> > conduct seems somehow hostile, also vague
> > appeals too strongly advertises judicial function
> > arbitration too strongly advertises judicial function
> > upset can minimise and subjectify bad actions
> > conflict very negative
> > resolution too vague but at least positive
> > reconciliation not attractive to complaints who want action
> > dispute[s] maybe?
>
> mediation?
>
elders used by tribes, group of elder/older, because their exprience
counsel as counselor Deanna Troi from Star Trek Next Generation
Groeten
Geert Stappers
--
Leven en laten leven
Reply to: