Re: Suggestion: Time limit for NM process
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 02:40:37PM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> So, your recommendation is to implement a parallel NM process to the
> existing one and prove that it is better? I doubt that it would make *any*
> sense when the DAMs won't accept the outcome of that process and this is
> *very* unlikely. :)
>
Have you actually asked them, with a clear proposal on how things will
work? I can't see the DAMs blocking something for the sake of it.
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the.earth.li B345BDD3
Reply to: