Re: Suggestion: Time limit for NM process
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 12:31:11PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> In short, I see quite some possibilities here. One thing I find
> demotivating about the discussions here is that new ideas are often met
> with responses like "impossible" or "won't work", while those posters
> hardly ever detail what *could* work to solve problems like that of too
> few AMs.
Yes, but that's not only true for the ML, but mostly for the whole project
as well. If you come up with ideas, those will be simply put down with "not
possible", "this won't work" or even "you're an idiot". I already gave up to
make public proposals on Debian MLs, because this is wasted time in most
cases. Some people are replying in private mails that they'd welcome those
ideas to get implemented, but those won't change anything.
> There won't be more AMs magically.
Hu? Not? *bummer* You mean there's no Wizard of Debian OS? ;o)
--
Ciao... // Fon: 0381-2744150
Ingo \X/ SIP: 2744150@sipgate.de
gpg pubkey: http://www.juergensmann.de/ij/public_key.asc
Reply to: