debian-lint-maint Oct 2017 by subject

[First Page] <
[previous page] 		Page 2 of 2 >
[next page] 		[Last Page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]
Bug#879206: lintian: debian-watch-uses-insecure-uri ignores sf.net redirector Bug#879206: marked as done (lintian: debian-watch-uses-insecure-uri ignores sf.net redirector) Bug#879235: lintian: Improving "unused-file-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright" Bug#879661: lintian: Fail to process ser-player due to invalid XML Bug#879661: marked as done (lintian: Fail to process ser-player due to invalid XML) Bug#879722: lintian: W-shlibs-symbol-not-found: false positive Bug#879809: lintian: warn about empty fields in control files Bug#879851: lintian: Only trigger package-installs-java-bytecode when number of classes exceeds 20 Bug#879851: lintian: package-installs-java-bytecode check produces too many false-positives Bug#879860: lintian: Do not trigger package-installs-java-bytecode if the path contains "WEB-INF", "demo", "doc", "example", "sample" or "test" Bug#879860: marked as done (lintian: Do not trigger package-installs-java-bytecode if the path contains "WEB-INF", "demo", "doc", "example", "sample" or "test") Bug#879861: lintian: Verify files package-installs-java-bytecode files really are Java class files Bug#879861: marked as done (lintian: Verify package-installs-java-bytecode files really are Java .class files) Bug#879862: lintian: Power the severity of package-installs-java-bytecode Bug#879862: marked as done (lintian: Lower the severity of package-installs-java-bytecode) Bug#879935: closed by Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org> (Bug#879935: fixed in lintian 2.5.56) Bug#879935: lintian: Please strongly discourage cross-unsafe getconf(1) interface Bug#879935: marked as done (lintian: Please strongly discourage cross-unsafe getconf(1) interface) Bug#879953: lintian: script-needs-depends-on-sensible-utils should not be emitted if there is already a Recommends on sensible-utils Bug#879953: marked as done (lintian: script-needs-depends-on-sensible-utils should not be emitted if there is already a Recommends on sensible-utils) Bug#879977: lintian: debian-control-has-empty-field false positives when first line is empty but wraps onto the next line Bug#879977: marked as done (lintian: debian-control-has-empty-field false positives when first line is empty but wraps onto the next line) Bug#880004: extended-description-is-empty doesn't catch debug packages Bug#880004: extended-description-is-empty doesn't catch packages Bug#880004: marked as done (extended-description-is-empty doesn't catch debug packages) Bug#880115: lintian: Please add bionic as known Ubuntu distribution Bug#880140: lintian: misdetects libcanberra-gstreamer as a GNU Smalltalk library Bug#880430: lintian: check for invalid arguments to dpkg-maintscript-helper Bug#880475: internal lintian shlib error running lintian -F on gcc-8-cross_1_amd64-changes Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_buster #187 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_buster #190 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_buster #204 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_buster #226 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_buster #227 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_buster #228 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_buster #229 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_buster #230 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_buster #231 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_buster #232 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_buster #233 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_buster #234 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_buster #235 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_buster #236 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_jessie #1227 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #1967 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #1968 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #1970 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #1971 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #1985 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #1986 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #1987 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #1992 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #1993 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #1994 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #1995 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #1996 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #1997 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #1998 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #1999 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2000 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2001 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2015 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2016 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2017 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2018 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2019 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2020 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2021 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2022 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2033 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2044 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2045 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2046 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2047 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2048 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2049 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2050 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2051 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2052 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2053 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2054 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2055 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2056 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2057 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2058 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2059 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2060 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2061 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2062 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2063 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2064 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_sid #2081 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_stretch #1113 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_stretch #1118 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_stretch #1119 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_stretch #1123 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_stretch #1128 Build failed in Jenkins: lintian-tests_stretch #1142 Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_buster #188 Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_buster #191 Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_buster #205 Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_buster #237 Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_jessie #1228 Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_sid #1969 Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_sid #1972 Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_sid #1988 Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_sid #2002 Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_sid #2023 Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_sid #2034 Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_sid #2065 Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_sid #2082 Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_stretch #1114 Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_stretch #1120 Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_stretch #1124 Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_stretch #1129 Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_stretch #1143 lintian_2.5.54~bpo9+1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into stretch-backports lintian_2.5.55_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable lintian_2.5.56_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable lintian_2.5.57_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Processed: limit source to lintian, tagging 701477 Processed: limit source to lintian, tagging 870898 Processed: limit source to lintian, tagging 871711 Processed: limit source to lintian, tagging 875636 Processed: limit source to lintian, tagging 877147 Processed: limit source to lintian, tagging 878575 Processed: lintian: Use of uninitialized value $parts[0] in string eq at …/checks/fields.pm line 512. / Use of uninitialized value $parts[-1] in string ne at …/checks/fields.pm lines 521 and 537. Processed: merge bugs Processed: notfixed 872699 in 2.5.51 Processed: notfound 879977 in 2.5.57, found 879977 in 2.5.56 Processed: Re: Add debian-watch-uses-insecure-uri tag (HTTP usage instead of HTTPS) Processed: Re: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath too strict Processed: Re: Bug#505857: lintian: false positive debian-watch-file-should-mangle-version Processed: Re: Bug#744388: lintian: warn about empty fields in control files Processed: Re: Bug#765166: lintian -- False positives on - license-problem-gfdl-invariants Processed: Re: Bug#825222: lintian: please allow debian/source/timestamps in unknown-file-in-debian-source Processed: Re: Bug#872611: lintian: Please warn on package using sensible-utils w/o relationship Processed: Re: Bug#878457: lintian: please remove "none were" → "none was" correction Processed: Re: Bug#878517: lintian: [PATCH] Manual reference fixups Processed: Re: Bug#879851: lintian: package-installs-java-bytecode check produces too many false-positives Processed: Re: Bug#879935 closed by Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org> (Bug#879935: fixed in lintian 2.5.56) Processed: Re: Bug#879935: closed by Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org> (Bug#879935: fixed in lintian 2.5.56) Processed: Re: Bug#880004: extended-description-is-empty doesn't catch debug packages Processed: Re: Bug#880004: extended-description-is-empty doesn't catch packages Processed: Re: debug-file-with-no-debug-symbols: mention lack of -g as common cause Processed: Re: invalid link to upgrading-checklist Processed: Re: lintian ignores profiles under $HOME Processed: Re: lintian should warn about old style setting of CFLAGS (noopt) Processed: Re: lintian: [new check] Check all files in debian directory for trailing spaces Processed: Re: lintian: [PATCH] Skip all POD synopsis tests if Test::Pod is not available Processed: Re: lintian: [PATCH] Spelling fixes Processed: Re: lintian: [PATCH] Update debconf reference mapping Processed: Re: lintian: [PATCH] Various link fixes and updates Processed: Re: lintian: Check for bad-distribution in debian/changelog too Processed: Re: lintian: cwl-runner should be added to acceptable interpreter list Processed: Re: lintian: debian-control-has-empty-field false positives when first line is empty but wraps onto the next line Processed: Re: lintian: debian-watch-uses-insecure-uri ignores sf.net redirector Processed: Re: lintian: Do not trigger package-installs-java-bytecode if the path contains "WEB-INF", "demo", "doc", "example", "sample" or "test" Processed: Re: lintian: do not warn about doxygen embedding jquery Processed: Re: lintian: Fail to process ser-player due to invalid XML Processed: Re: lintian: False positive for dh-exec-script-without-dh-exec-features Processed: Re: lintian: false positive: license-problem-non-free-RFC debian/copyright Processed: Re: lintian: Incorrectly identified as minified Javascript ("source-is-missing") Processed: Re: lintian: Lower the severity of package-installs-java-bytecode Processed: Re: lintian: misdetects libcanberra-gstreamer as a GNU Smalltalk library Processed: Re: lintian: more false positives in copyright-year-in-future Processed: Re: lintian: Only trigger package-installs-java-bytecode when number of classes exceeds 20 Processed: Re: lintian: Please accept and recommend new vcs-mtn mtn:// uri format Processed: Re: lintian: Please add bionic as known Ubuntu distribution Processed: Re: lintian: please allow debian/source/timestamps in unknown-file-in-debian-source Processed: Re: lintian: Please check for boilerplate from /etc/init.d/skeleton Processed: Re: lintian: Please check for Python modules with overly generic names Processed: Re: lintian: please check latest-debian-changelog-entry-without-new-date for sources as well Processed: Re: lintian: Please permit empty md5sums files Processed: Re: lintian: Please strongly discourage cross-unsafe getconf(1) interface Processed: Re: lintian: please warn about files in /usr/lib/pythonX.Y/dist-packages/tests/__init__.py Processed: Re: lintian: Please warn on unnecessary dpkg-architecture invocations Processed: Re: lintian: Power the severity of package-installs-java-bytecode Processed: Re: lintian: privacy-breach-donation check should ignore URLs in comments Processed: Re: lintian: remove 'mount' from the list of essential packages Processed: Re: lintian: script-needs-depends-on-sensible-utils should not be emitted if there is already a Recommends on sensible-utils Processed: Re: lintian: script-needs-depends-on-sensible-utils triggers although depends on sensible-utils is present Processed: Re: lintian: treat e2fsprogs as non-essential Processed: Re: lintian: tried to issue unknown tag example-script-uses-deprecated-nodejs-location at /srv/lintian.debian.org/lintian/checks/scripts.pm line 227. Processed: Re: lintian: Use of uninitialized value in string eq at …/checks/fields.pm line 512. / Use of uninitialized value in string ne at …/checks/fields.pm lines 521 and 537. Processed: Re: lintian: Verify files package-installs-java-bytecode files really are Java class files Processed: Re: lintian: warn about empty fields in binary package control files Processed: Re: lintian: warn about empty fields in control files Processed: Re: lintian: warn against wrongly named override files Processed: Re: warn if native systemd service files only wrap existing SysV/LSB init scripts Processed: retitle 701477 to lintian: Should it support XDG for user configuration/data? Processed: tagging 660165 Processed: tagging 839124 Processed: your mail Processing of lintian_2.5.54~bpo9+1_amd64.changes Processing of lintian_2.5.55_amd64.changes Processing of lintian_2.5.56_amd64.changes Processing of lintian_2.5.57_amd64.changes uscan + lintian vcs-field-uses-not-recommended-uri-format (bzr) The last update was on 07:16 GMT Wed May 29. There are 721 messages. Page 2 of 2.
<<
[previous month] 		|<
[first page] 		<
[previous page] 		Page 2 of 2
 >
[next page] 		>|
[last page] 		>>
[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]
Mail converted by MHonArc